Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

aetas infantiae proxima

Read a random definition: ferdfare

A quick definition of aetas infantiae proxima:

Aetas infantiae proxima is a Latin term used in Roman law to describe the time period between infancy (up to 7 years old) and puberty (12 to 14 years old). For boys, this period is specifically between 7 and 10 1/2 years old. It is also known as the time of childhood between being a baby and becoming a teenager.

A more thorough explanation:

AETAS INFANTIAE PROXIMA

AETAS INFANTIAE PROXIMA is a Latin term used in Roman law to refer to the first part of childhood between infancy and puberty. It specifically refers to the period between 7 and 10 1/2 years of age for males. This period is also known as the pre-pubertal stage.

During the AETAS INFANTIAE PROXIMA, children are still developing their cognitive and physical abilities. They are not yet fully capable of making decisions on their own and require guidance from adults.

For example, a 9-year-old boy in the AETAS INFANTIAE PROXIMA may not be able to understand complex concepts like financial management or politics. He may still need help with basic tasks like tying his shoelaces or brushing his teeth.

Another example is that during this period, children may still believe in imaginary creatures like the tooth fairy or Santa Claus. They may also have a limited understanding of social norms and may need guidance on appropriate behavior in different situations.

These examples illustrate how the AETAS INFANTIAE PROXIMA is a crucial period of development for children. It is a time when they are still learning and growing, and require support and guidance from adults to help them navigate the world around them.

aetas | aetas legitima

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
@llama i do not need or desire external validation.
17:40
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: ah I see
17:41
@LawIsForPeasants: ok, sorry, I will not bother u while u 'self validate yourself in the corner' my bad.
@llama: im self validating so hard rn
17:42
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: thats very ithica of you, wasp.
texaslawhopefully
17:44
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: Out of curiosity, since you're in law school and prolly know fedsoc people, how conservative do you think you have to be to be in fedsoc? Like is a david french sort of conservative fairly common in it, or is it the maga type people mainly
i dont interact with any fedsoc people, but i dont know any maga people at cornell. but the student body overwhelmingly leans left, so i think they might not be comfortable showing that theyre conservative if that makes sense?
one time a guy kind of crashed out about masks in conlaw
but that's the most ive seen
texaslawhopefully
17:47
Yeah, that does make sense. I would like to join fedsoc, but I'm also, clearly, very opposed to Trump and where the GOP has gone.
if you join fedsoc and go for clerking and eventually become a judge. you will be pinholed into maga politics as long as maga is the predominant conservative stance
Idk if @irishdinosaur is online but congrats on UCLA!!
next you will say you want to be the first black kkk grand wizard
@SaddestPortlander: tysm!!!!
texaslawhopefully
18:00
yes congrats irishdinosaur! that's incredible
18:03
@IrishDinosaur: you inspire me and my completely misguided cope that I might ever get into UCLA
Super big congrats irish!!!
Also pretty much agree with Wasp. I think it’s more about getting the political/judicial position as a Fedsoc member that will likely require a stance siding with whatever the conservative majority party is at that time.
texaslawhopefully
18:07
Yeah, that's fair. I guess I need to think about it more assuming I start law school in the fall. I really want to clerk and that seems like the best option.
BUT i think once you get the position, you’ll have more leeway in making decisions more liberally. Sort of like how ACB and Gorsuch sometimes swing left after being portreayed in the media as far right (not sure if that was actually the case though).
From the perspective of someone who interned at the White House, I will add that my bosses always told me to “be careful about my resume.” Don’t want to align with any org that doesn’t fit your values because you won’t be trusted by the other side until you show them you’re legit again, and word travels in DC.
texaslawhopefully
18:10
I mean I highly highly doubt I'll become a federal judge, it's more just about getting a leg up in getting opportunities in the first place
Not sure how that true that is in practice and sorry for the long messages💀
texaslawhopefully
18:10
And, yeah, that's fair. Right now my resume probably looks like it's from someone who is center-right
Honestly, it just depends on your values. If you ever see yourself being a dem member in any capacity, then MAYBE stay away. But like you just said, there’s a possibility to look moderate with the right WE post law school.
texaslawhopefully
18:12
Yeah, that's true as well. As a side note, it's very cool you interned with the white house, I know those internships are incredibly hard to get
Dkk
18:12
A lot of conservativism right now is also just be as aggressive and unwilling to compromise in decision making right now because the left is out there in lets appeal to 1% of the population land so proposals brought to the table by them are 1, insane and 2, all or nothing proposals with no compromise.
Dkk
18:12
It's a bad time to be partisan really in any way.
I had to apply 4 times and got off the WL so I barely got it. It was a cool exp but def not any work crazier than you would see on capitol hill or any political org imo.
texaslawhopefully
18:14
It def looks great on your resume though
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.