Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

annexation

Read a random definition: investment indebtedness

A quick definition of annexation:

Annexation is when a country, state, or city takes control of land that was not originally part of it. This is done through a formal process that involves raising a flag and making an announcement. Sometimes, the land being annexed is not connected to the rest of the area, and a narrow strip of land is used to connect the two. This is called cherry-stem annexation.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Annexation is the act of attaching or incorporating land within a nation, state, or municipality's dominion. It can also refer to the point at which a fixture becomes a part of the realty to which it is attached.

Examples:

  • When a city decides to annex a nearby area, it means that the city is incorporating that land into its boundaries.
  • If a homeowner installs a built-in bookshelf, it becomes a fixture and is annexed to the property.
  • Cherry-stem annexation is a type of annexation where the annexed land is not contiguous to the acquiring municipality, and a narrow corridor of annexed land leads to the targeted area. This type of annexation is called cherry-stem because the annexed territory resembles a cherry on a map, with the narrow corridor being the stem.

The examples illustrate how annexation can refer to both the incorporation of land into a larger entity and the attachment of fixtures to real property. Cherry-stem annexation is a specific type of annexation that involves a unique configuration of annexed land.

animus | anniversary date

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
babycat
15:11
I don’t think the movie is responsible for the intelligence of the average viewer and I don’t think it needs to have an unambiguous moral message to be a good film
babycat
15:12
This is like those people who say that Lolita is ontologically evil because it’s from the perspective of the narrator. You need to be comfortable with ambiguity in life
babycat
15:12
The movie or book doesn’t have to tell you how to feel
well with lolita maybe some versions don't have it but at least in the original russian publication the foreword of the book is that this is a court transcript of his confession
so yeah it does tell you how to feel because it shows every description of her is completely untrue and warped
but nabokov published much weirder shit than lolita as wild as that is lol
babycat
15:14
I love Pale Fire
what's the name of the one about siblings
babycat
15:15
Ada or Ardor I think
Dkk
15:16
I think it can be ambiguous, but it should be something the viewer should be able to figure out. If not then what is the point. In terms of audience intelligence, I don't think the highest level of movie watchers would care for this movie. I think the opposite. The movie does not appeal to the highest level of movie watchers. It also doesn't appeal to like the lowest level either. It just tells a simple story that comes off as propoganda.
yeah you're right thank you
i agree dkk if we are talking about lolita
babycat
15:16
we’re talking about the movie perfect days by wim wenders
unfortunately it very much distills the actual novel which yeah i mean that is typical of any film ever so it's not profound of me to say that
LSDFan
15:17
yo dkk, send the dick again
ohh okay i have no idea what that is
15:17
Does the status date disappearing on GW mean something?
Dkk
15:17
Ahh nah was talking about the Japanese movie. And I would say how people are comfortable with ambiguity can be completely different. I feel as if when I see ambiguity I just say whatever, but when others see it they obsess over it to the point they gain anxiety and it is not healthy. Engaging with ambiguity is not something that should be encouraged.
15:17
@FormerLN: may mean you're due for a decision in their next wave
15:18
they had a wave yesterday so probably won't hear back for another week or so
15:18
average lsd chat when theres no wave
Dkk
15:19
@LSDFan: here you go ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣠⣶⣿⣿⣿⣷⣤⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣾⡿⠋⠀⠿⠇⠉⠻⣿⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢠⣿⠏⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠙⣿⣆⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⢠⣿⡏⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠸⣿⣆⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⢸⣿⡄⠀⠀⠀⢀⣤⣀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⡿⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠻⣿⣶⣶⣾⡿⠟⢿⣷⣶⣶⣿⡟⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⡏⠉⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠉⠉⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⡇⠀⠀⣸⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⡇⢀⣴⣿⠇⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⢀⣠⣴⣿⣷⣿⠟⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣧⣄⡀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⢀⣴⡿⠛⠉⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⠉⠙⢿⣷⣄⠀ ⢠⣿⠏⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠙⣿⣆ ⣿⡟⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢹⣿ ⣿⣇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢸⣿⡆⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢸⣿ ⢹⣿⡄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢿⣷⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣾⡿ ⠀⠻⣿⣦⣀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⣿⣷⣄⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣀⣤⣾⡟⠁ ⠀⠀⠈⠛⠿⣿⣷⣶⣾⡿⠿⠛⠻⢿⣿⣶⣾⣿⠿⠛⠉⠀⠀
misoissocute
15:19
bruh im at worl
misoissocute
15:19
work
15:19
I click back onto this tab at work and that's what i see
Dkk
15:20
It was asked for. I must oblige.
Dkk
15:20
I am honor bound.
babycat
15:20
"Engaging with ambiguity is not something that should be encouraged" is a crazy ass thing for a future lawyer to say. Bro that's your job
JumpySubsequentDolphin
15:21
one of the tips is messed up
Dkk
15:21
Nah my job is to write good clean consise law that removes ambiguity. If I run into a case where things are too ambiguous for me, it is because I have not developed a strong enough theory to work within.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.