Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

appointment

Read a random definition: hostler

A quick definition of appointment:

An appointment is when someone is chosen for a job or duty, especially for a government position. It can also mean the office or position that someone has been appointed to. In parliamentary law, it refers to naming someone to a position without an election. Appointment can also refer to the act of disposing of property through a power of appointment. Illusory appointment is a type of transfer of property that is not really effective.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Appointment refers to the designation of a person for a job or duty, especially for a public office. It can also refer to the act of disposing of property through a power granted for that purpose.

  • The President has the power of appointment for principal federal officials, subject to senatorial consent.
  • John received a high appointment in the federal government.
  • The committee members were named through appointment rather than election.
  • The tenant made an appointment of lands through a power of appointment.

The first example illustrates how appointment can refer to the naming of someone to a public office. The second example shows how appointment can refer to a specific office occupied by someone who has been appointed. The third example demonstrates how appointment can be used in parliamentary law to name an officer or committee member. The fourth example shows how appointment can refer to the act of disposing of property through a power of appointment.

Overall, appointment refers to the act of designating someone for a job or duty, or the act of disposing of property through a power granted for that purpose.

appointive property | Appointments Clause

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
JumpySubsequentDolphin
21:51
guys give me good comedy movies
@shaquilleoatmeal: I would agree with that. It'd also just increase the frequency of confirmation hearings and those are always shit shows.
shaquilleoatmeal
21:52
i honestly see the courts as a clear 6-3 but thats just me, check out this article, id be interested to hear more on what you think ! https://ballsandstrikes.org/law-politics/3-3-3-court-no-cmon-not-this-again/
21:52
i personally think it should be an 8 year term with a term limit of 3 terms. so 24 years total. and one's position can be given to another candidate as well, doesn't just always go to the incumbent
21:52
dont tell me my math is wrong im still tired
you don’t mess with the zohan is goated
glovediedthisishismom
21:52
fizzy bubbly
shaquilleoatmeal
21:53
@JumpySubsequentDolphin: you want straight up comedy or rom com?
JumpySubsequentDolphin
21:54
hmmm I think the people w me would prefer regular comedy
shaquilleoatmeal
21:54
you gotta reform congress, youd see the changes in the supreme court kick in
21:55
not to doom but there's no way conservatives would vote for a term limit on SCOTUS if the majority is going to rule in favor of conservative interests in a patterned way
21:56
for many people in politics, not just conservatives, the ends justify the means and the means could be anti-american if it means achieving a "patriotic" end so to speak
shaquilleoatmeal
21:56
crazy rich asians, due date (older side of movies), hit man
shaquilleoatmeal
21:57
actually scratch all that - watch no hard feelings
crazy rich asians is cracked
21:58
oh its so good
21:58
im probably going to take these comedy suggestions because it's just me alone until like december 1 or 2 i forgor
JumpySubsequentDolphin
21:58
@shaquilleoatmeal: my sister in law hated no hard feelings
JumpySubsequentDolphin
21:58
Constance Wu is so beautiful
i forgor
shaquilleoatmeal
21:59
damn what, i thought it was a funny movie
babycat
22:00
i went to this one club that’s in crazy rich Asians. the rooftop bar
@shaquilleoatmeal: It's not a bad article, but I still don't buy it because (a) I think it glosses over cases like Milligan way too quickly without even going into why there was an ideological split (which there was for a reason and that case did matter) and (b) I think the 3-3-3 court description is also grounded in the difference in jurisprudence between the two groups (and that they aligned on cases like the SFAA one could say more about the facts of the case, than jurisprudential differences)
babycat
22:00
It’s called ce la vie
@shaquilleoatmeal: I’ll also preface, I am a little biased—I’m a big fan of Sara Isgur and David French.
shaquilleoatmeal
22:03
^^ advisory opinions ?
shaquilleoatmeal
22:04
i was trying to get into that with scorp before lsd crashed
shaquilleoatmeal
22:04
not aware of Milligan - what was the split and why
Essentially if an Alabama redistricting map violated Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. It was 5-4 with Kavanaugh and Robert’s in the majority. A very important case.
@shaquilleoatmeal: yes! I love advisory opinions
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.