Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

asset-coverage test

Read a random definition: collatione facta uni post mortem alterius

A quick definition of asset-coverage test:

Asset-Coverage Test: A rule that says a company can only borrow more money if they have enough assets (like buildings or equipment) to cover their debts. The test sets a minimum ratio of assets to debt that the company must maintain in order to borrow more money.

A more thorough explanation:

An asset-coverage test is a restriction in a bond-indenture that allows a company to borrow more money only if the ratio of its assets to debt does not fall below a certain minimum. This test is used to ensure that a company has enough assets to cover its debts and can continue to pay its creditors.

Let's say a company has $10 million in assets and $5 million in long-term debt. The asset-coverage ratio would be 2:1 ($10 million divided by $5 million). If the bond-indenture requires a minimum asset-coverage ratio of 1.5:1, the company would be allowed to borrow more money as long as its assets remain above $7.5 million (1.5 times its long-term debt).

Another example would be a company that has $20 million in assets and $10 million in long-term debt. The asset-coverage ratio would be 2:1 ($20 million divided by $10 million). If the bond-indenture requires a minimum asset-coverage ratio of 2:1, the company would not be allowed to borrow more money until it increases its assets or reduces its debt.

These examples illustrate how the asset-coverage test works. It ensures that a company has enough assets to cover its debts and can continue to pay its creditors. If a company's asset-coverage ratio falls below the minimum required by the bond-indenture, it may be a sign that the company is in financial trouble and may not be able to meet its obligations.

asset-based financing | asset-depreciation range

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
BookwormBroker
16:10
same
RoaldDahl
16:10
@HopefullyInLawSchool: what if i already got rejected. does it mean anything
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.