Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

assign

Read a random definition: case of first impression

A quick definition of assign:

Assigning means giving something to someone else. This can happen in two ways: (1) giving someone else the rights and responsibilities of a contract you have with someone else, or (2) giving someone else the property you are renting from someone else. When you assign a contract, you are giving someone else the right to do what you were supposed to do and the responsibility to do it. For example, if you were supposed to teach someone guitar for $50, you could assign that contract to someone else who would then be responsible for teaching guitar and getting paid. There are rules about assigning contracts, like you can't assign a contract that hasn't been made yet, and the person you were supposed to do something for can sue the person you assigned the contract to if they don't do what they were supposed to do. When you assign property, you are giving someone else the right to use it for a certain amount of time. For example, if you were renting a house from someone, you could assign the rental agreement to someone else who would then be responsible for paying rent and living in the house. There are different rules for assigning property, like the person you assign it to might have different rights than you did, depending on how you assign it.

A more thorough explanation:

Assign is when one party transfers rights, property, or benefits to another party. This can happen in both contract and property law.

Under contract law, when one party assigns a contract, they are transferring both their rights and duties to another party. For example, if A contracts with B to teach B guitar for $50, A can assign this contract to C. Here, A is transferring their rights to the $50 and their duty to teach guitar to C. In this example, A is the "assignor," C is the "assignee," and B is the "obligor."

There are a few rules regarding assignments under contract law. First, you cannot assign your future right to an assignee if you have not yet secured the contract to perform duties to another. Second, you cannot assign rights if they materially change the obligor's duty and rights. Third, the obligor can sue the assignee directly if the assignee does not pay them.

Under property law, assignment typically arises in landlord-tenant situations. For example, if A is renting from landlord B but wants another party (C) to take over the property, A can choose between assigning and subleasing the property to C. If assigning, A would give C the entire balance of the term, with no reversion to anyone. Under a sublease, A would give C the property for a limited period of the remaining term.

Under assignment, C would have privity of estate with the landlord while under a sublease, C would not.

If A assigns their contract with B to C, C is now responsible for paying A the $50 and teaching guitar to B. If C does not pay A, B can sue C directly. If C does not teach guitar to B, B can sue C and then compel A to fulfill the duties under secondary liability.

asset purchase agreement | assigned risk

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
lilypadfrog
20:31
that seems crazy #tome
texaslawhopefully
20:32
No, at least from the two people I know there that’s false. I think it’s just something like Chicago for conservatives is on par with S whereas for liberals it’s below HYS but above CCNP
texaslawhopefully
20:32
I mean I think even the student body there only like 15 percent is part of fedsoc
It's more just not a good # for people who aren't willing to clerk conservative. I'm sure they place liberal clerks at an above average rate for a t-6 though. Maybe higher (not entirely sure)
texaslawhopefully
20:34
Page 14 has ideological splits by school: https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/msen/files/law-prof-ideology.pdf
texaslawhopefully
20:35
Chicago/UVA are more to the right but not by an exceedingly large difference
lilypadfrog
20:36
I feel like UVA doesn’t have that reputation the way Chicago does. That’s interesting. Thanks tex
yeah I've heard about uva being conservative
siroracle
20:48
Yeah it’s only 75 percent lib that’s pretty terrifying
Dkk
20:53
lmfao
20:59
@siroracle: funny cause true
@siroracle: don't you have a bridge to be under?
shouldn't you be collecting tolls
21:00
trolololol
atwatodbit
21:04
anyone know much about mich clerking
atwatodbit
21:05
ive tried to learn more about it but its hard to cut through stuff. numbers wise they look good?
21:06
this website is a good research tool for outcomes: https://app.lawhub.org/schools
atwatodbit
21:06
@llama: thanks!
21:06
yah
Dkk
21:10
Anyone else read the Antioch shooters manifesto today. Pretty crazy stuff.
21:14
sad
YRDSL
21:31
@texaslawhopefully: it's pretty funny how even in law journal articles people can't stop confusing Penn with Penn State
texaslawhopefully
21:40
lmfao I didn't even notice that
21:42
Yeah to penn Carey students I’m sure that is a
21:42
Those are fighting words
21:46
@Dkk: one of the most deranged documents i've ever had the displeasure of reading
lilypadfrog
22:03
sometimes I go into fight or flight mode until I get all my work done
i call that locking in
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.