Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

at-risk rules

Read a random definition: autonomy of the parties

A quick definition of at-risk rules:

AT-RISK RULES: These are rules that limit the amount of money a taxpayer can deduct as losses to the amount they could actually lose. This is done to prevent taxpayers from using losses to avoid paying taxes on their income.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: At-risk rules are limitations set by the government on the amount of deductible losses a taxpayer can claim. These rules prevent taxpayers from using losses to reduce their taxable income beyond what they could actually lose.

For example, let's say a taxpayer invests $10,000 in a business venture. If the business fails and the taxpayer loses all $10,000, they can deduct the full amount of the loss on their tax return. However, if the taxpayer only invested $5,000 of their own money and borrowed the other $5,000, they can only deduct up to $5,000 of the loss on their tax return. This is because they are only at risk for losing the $5,000 they invested, not the full $10,000.

Another example would be if a taxpayer invests in a real estate partnership. If the partnership incurs losses, the taxpayer can only deduct their share of the losses up to the amount they are at risk for losing. If the taxpayer is only at risk for losing $20,000, they cannot deduct more than $20,000 of the partnership's losses on their tax return.

atpatruus | atrocious assault

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
14:30
Sent an app to OSU in early december and have STILL not heard back
Give it 4 more weeks at least. Everyone in this chat needs to wait longer.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.