Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

back-to-back life sentences

Read a random definition: ordinary standing rule

A quick definition of back-to-back life sentences:

Back-to-back life sentences means a person who committed multiple serious crimes can be sentenced to serve many life sentences one after the other. A life sentence means the person must stay in prison for a very long time, usually 15 to 25 years, before they can ask to be released. Back-to-back life sentences make it harder for the person to be released because they have to serve many more years in prison. Some people who got back-to-back life sentences did very bad things, like killing many people.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Back-to-back life sentences refer to when a defendant is given two or more consecutive life terms for committing multiple crimes. A life sentence usually means the defendant must serve 15 to 25 years in prison before being eligible for parole, but back-to-back life sentences can increase the number of years they must serve before being considered for parole. The purpose of back-to-back life sentences is to limit the possibility of parole for defendants who have committed multiple serious crimes.

  • Terry Nichols was given 161 life sentences and 9,300 years without parole for his role in the Oklahoma City Bombing.
  • Michael J Devlin was given 74 life sentences for multiple counts of kidnapping, armed criminal action, forced sodomy, child pornography, attempted murder, and more.
  • Gary Ridgway, also known as the "Green River Killer," was given 48 life sentences for murdering women between 1982 and 1998.

These examples illustrate how back-to-back life sentences can be used to ensure that defendants who have committed multiple serious crimes serve a longer time in prison before being considered for parole.

back pay | background fact

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.