Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

bairn's part

Read a random definition: grand distress

A quick definition of bairn's part:

Term: Bairn's Part

Definition: In Scottish law, when a father passes away, his surviving children have the right to share in his movable estate. This is called the bairn's part or legitim. If the father's spouse is still alive, the bairn's part is one-third of the estate. If there is no surviving spouse, the bairn's part is one-half of the estate.

Also known as: Legitim

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Bairn's part is a term used in Scots law to refer to the right of any surviving lawful issue to share in the movable estate of the father. Legitim is another term used to describe this right. The legitim comprised one-third of the estate if there was a surviving spouse, or one-half otherwise.

Example: If a father passes away and leaves behind a movable estate worth $300,000, his surviving spouse and children would be entitled to a share of the estate. If there is a surviving spouse, the legitim or bairn's part would be one-third of the estate, which is $100,000. If there is no surviving spouse, the legitim or bairn's part would be one-half of the estate, which is $150,000.

This example illustrates how the bairn's part or legitim ensures that the surviving lawful issue of a father are entitled to a share of his movable estate. The amount of the bairn's part or legitim depends on whether there is a surviving spouse or not.

bail to the sheriff | bait advertising

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
40-50 fed clerks is pretty cool
texaslawhopefully
20:29
That’s fair. Chicago though: https://www.law.uchicago.edu/clerkships
That's sweet. Again tho, unclear with Fedsoc tho. But u sounded like ur willing to go Fedsoc so ur set
lilypadfrog
20:31
yeah Tex is a fedsoc guy iirc
lilypadfrog
20:31
Is it really like no clerkship benefit at Chicago if you’re not conservative?
lilypadfrog
20:31
that seems crazy #tome
texaslawhopefully
20:32
No, at least from the two people I know there that’s false. I think it’s just something like Chicago for conservatives is on par with S whereas for liberals it’s below HYS but above CCNP
texaslawhopefully
20:32
I mean I think even the student body there only like 15 percent is part of fedsoc
It's more just not a good # for people who aren't willing to clerk conservative. I'm sure they place liberal clerks at an above average rate for a t-6 though. Maybe higher (not entirely sure)
texaslawhopefully
20:34
Page 14 has ideological splits by school: https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/msen/files/law-prof-ideology.pdf
texaslawhopefully
20:35
Chicago/UVA are more to the right but not by an exceedingly large difference
lilypadfrog
20:36
I feel like UVA doesn’t have that reputation the way Chicago does. That’s interesting. Thanks tex
yeah I've heard about uva being conservative
siroracle
20:48
Yeah it’s only 75 percent lib that’s pretty terrifying
Dkk
20:53
lmfao
20:59
@siroracle: funny cause true
@siroracle: don't you have a bridge to be under?
shouldn't you be collecting tolls
21:00
trolololol
atwatodbit
21:04
anyone know much about mich clerking
atwatodbit
21:05
ive tried to learn more about it but its hard to cut through stuff. numbers wise they look good?
21:06
this website is a good research tool for outcomes: https://app.lawhub.org/schools
atwatodbit
21:06
@llama: thanks!
21:06
yah
Dkk
21:10
Anyone else read the Antioch shooters manifesto today. Pretty crazy stuff.
21:14
sad
YRDSL
21:31
@texaslawhopefully: it's pretty funny how even in law journal articles people can't stop confusing Penn with Penn State
texaslawhopefully
21:40
lmfao I didn't even notice that
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.