Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Baker v. Selden doctrine

Read a random definition: abnormally dangerous activity

A quick definition of Baker v. Selden doctrine:

The Baker v. Selden doctrine is a legal principle that says you cannot claim ownership over an idea or concept, only the specific expression of that idea. This means that if someone creates a new way of doing something, they cannot prevent others from using the same idea, as long as they do not copy the exact way it was expressed. This is similar to the merger doctrine, which says that if there are only a limited number of ways to express an idea, then those expressions cannot be protected by copyright.

A more thorough explanation:

The Baker v. Selden doctrine is a legal principle that states that the expression of an idea is not protected by copyright law, only the specific way in which the idea is expressed. This means that if someone creates a work that is based on an idea, they cannot claim copyright protection for the idea itself, only for the specific expression of that idea.

For example, if someone writes a book about a young wizard attending a school of magic, they cannot claim copyright protection for the idea of a young wizard attending a school of magic. However, they can claim copyright protection for the specific characters, plot, and dialogue in their book.

This doctrine is important because it allows for the free flow of ideas and encourages creativity and innovation. It also prevents individuals from monopolizing ideas and stifling competition.

bait advertising | balance

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
RoaldDahl
16:05
dodged the mich r wave what does this mean
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:06
it means you will not be rejected today and may be accepted or WL in the future
Just got my Michigan rejection
BookwormBroker
16:10
same
RoaldDahl
16:10
@HopefullyInLawSchool: what if i already got rejected. does it mean anything
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.