Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

blind trust

Read a random definition: ISO

A quick definition of blind trust:

A blind trust is a type of trust where the person who creates the trust (the trustor) and the person who will receive the assets (the beneficiary) do not know what is inside the trust. Instead, a trustee manages the trust until the assets are supposed to be given to the beneficiary or until the trustor decides to close the trust. People use blind trusts to avoid conflicts of interest or to hide assets from others. For example, politicians may use blind trusts to keep their assets private. However, some people criticize blind trusts because the trustor still knows what assets they put into the trust, which could create a conflict of interest.

A more thorough explanation:

A blind trust is a type of trust where the trustor (the person who creates the trust) and the beneficiary (the person who receives the assets from the trust) do not know what assets are inside the trust after it is created. Instead, a trustee manages the trust until the assets are supposed to be given to the beneficiaries or until the trustor decides to close the trust (if it is a revocable trust).

People often use blind trusts to avoid conflicts of interest or to hide assets from beneficiaries. For example, politicians, corporate officers, and other public figures may put their investments into a blind trust before taking on new ventures. This way, they can avoid any accusations of favoritism or bias towards certain companies or industries.

However, blind trusts are not foolproof. While the trustor and beneficiary may not know what assets are in the trust, they still know what assets they put into the trust. This means that they may still have a conflict of interest, even if they are not aware of the specific assets in the trust.

Another use of blind trusts for politicians is to avoid disclosing their assets when they are elected to office. Normally, politicians must disclose what assets they own, but they can avoid this by placing their assets into a blind trust. This prevents them from having to disclose the contents of the trust.

For example, if a politician owns stock in a company that may be affected by a new law they are proposing, they could put that stock into a blind trust. This way, they would not be accused of passing the law to benefit themselves financially.

blind tiger | blog

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
Nostradumbass
10:44
I wrote mine about how all activists should be consolidated into a large smelting pot and refined down to a viscous goo
Nostradumbass
10:45
Expecting a lot of rejections though
11:07
I'm sure you'll get a full ride to a few schools :P
11:11
The impression I get is most schools try not to judge based on the political implications of what you write about. They probably care more that you saw a problem and tried to fix it. That seems like a great thing to write a PS about @chowie
11:18
Besides, if a school didn’t let you in for trying to fix a problem you saw in your community, that doesn’t say great things about your school’s culture (assuming the thing you did showed good common sense judgment ofc)
11:19
That school’s* culture
11:23
Thanks Howl you're right :D I def talked about solving problems in my PS
12:03
@HowlEngineer: what's your dream school
MildChiller
12:08
"Have you applied for admission to [school] in a prior year" I applied in Oct. of the 23-24 cycle, should I put 23 or 24 as the year I applied?
MildChiller
12:09
Bcuz 2023 is when I technically applied but I applied for admissions in 2024
12:14
2024 cuz that's when you would've been admitted
I agree with Howl
12:19
Gecko what's ur dream school
Hard to say. I'm pretty firmly committed to the philly area so probably temple or villanova
Also relatively debt averse so I'd have to get a good scholarship from BC or Fordham to want to go but that's not very likely for me
Any advice? lol
[] baddestbunny
12:25
what’s a good scholarship for you? what would make BC or Fordham worth it?
12:25
Hmmmm let me think
[] baddestbunny
12:25
fordham’s max aid they give is 45k per year
Bunny I can possibly get a 75%+ scholarship from villanova or temple, and I'd be moving back in with my parents if I went there so I'd have near-zero COL. It'd be really hard to beat that
I would prefer BC over Fordham just because I like boston more, but I'm expecting a WL there tbh
I would maybe consider BC with $ but I don't know how to decide if a better biglaw chance is worth the COL + higher tuition
12:50
How do I know if my status checkers are properly linked
12:59
@ChowieBean: right now, Michigan, but there are several that come close. How about you?
13:05
@Law01: I haven't gotten the status checkers to work at all. When I sent an email to the LSData folks the other week, they said they were working on fixing them
13:10
but I think "Last Checked" would change from "Never" to something else
13:30
@HowlEngineer: I'll get more specific once I get my LSAT score, but NYU, Berk, GTown, UCLA
13:30
Anywhere that's top for PI
14:54
What do people typically write in the 'Optional Statement' for Georgetown
15:25
Yale application is wayyy too much work
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.