Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

bonded debt

Read a random definition: inquisition

A quick definition of bonded debt:

Bonded Debt: Bonded debt is a type of debt that is secured by a bond. This means that a business or government entity issues bonds to raise money, and the bondholders have a claim on the assets of the entity if it fails to repay the debt. Bonded debt is a long-term debt that is usually used to finance large projects or investments. It is important for investors to understand the risks associated with bonded debt, as the value of the bonds can fluctuate based on market conditions and the financial health of the entity issuing the bonds.

A more thorough explanation:

Bonded debt is a type of debt that is secured by a bond. It refers to a business or government debt that is represented by issued bonds. This means that the borrower has issued bonds to investors in exchange for the borrowed money. The borrower is then obligated to pay back the borrowed money plus interest to the bondholders.

For example, a company may issue bonds to raise money for a new project. The investors who buy the bonds become the company's creditors and are entitled to receive interest payments and the return of their principal investment when the bonds mature. The company is obligated to pay back the bondholders according to the terms of the bond agreement.

Another example is when a government issues bonds to finance public projects such as infrastructure development. The bondholders are entitled to receive interest payments and the return of their principal investment when the bonds mature. The government is obligated to pay back the bondholders according to the terms of the bond agreement.

These examples illustrate how bonded debt works and how it is used by businesses and governments to raise capital.

bonded | bonded warehouse

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.