LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

boundary by acquiescence

Read a random definition: in facie curiae

A quick definition of boundary by acquiescence:

Boundary by acquiescence: This means that two people or groups have agreed on where their property boundaries are without actually putting up a physical boundary marker. They have simply accepted the boundary as it is and have not disputed it. This is also known as an agreed boundary.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Boundary by acquiescence is a type of boundary that is established when two neighboring landowners agree to a boundary line by their actions or lack of objection over a period of time. This is also known as an agreed boundary.

Example: Two neighbors have a fence that has been in the same location for over 20 years. Even though the fence is not on the exact property line, both neighbors have maintained the fence and have not objected to its location. This establishes a boundary by acquiescence.

Explanation: In this example, the two neighbors have agreed to the location of the boundary line by their actions of maintaining the fence and not objecting to its location for over 20 years. This type of boundary is recognized by the courts and is legally binding.

boulwarism | boundary by agreement

General

General chat about the legal profession.

General >T14 Off Topic

👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎

Dkk

17:37

@texaslawhopefully: Psssh I would not use gender relations as a way to defend Trump. He does not go that route and I think literally him and everyone in their cabinet has no idea what those are. I mean, just look at how many divorces Elon and Trump have had.

texaslawhopefully

17:38

Was that not why you said you voted for him?

sadpadresfan

17:38

@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: can I ask what “2 years retroactive withdrawals” means

llama

17:39

elon and trump realize there are many fish in the sea, and sometimes u can't just 'make it work'

KnowledgeableRitzyWasp

17:39

@sadpadresfan: grades changed to W for two consecutive years of classes

Dkk

17:39

Nah, I did not vote. I have never voted in my life because I have a lot of issues with it. 4 years ago my mom filled out my ballot for me because she wanted to but I do not vote.

llama

17:40

based fellow non voter

LawIsForPeasants

17:40

@llama i do not need or desire external validation.

sadpadresfan

17:40

@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: ah I see

llama

17:41

@LawIsForPeasants: ok, sorry, I will not bother u while u 'self validate yourself in the corner' my bad.

KnowledgeableRitzyWasp

17:41

@llama: im self validating so hard rn

llama

17:42

@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: thats very ithica of you, wasp.

texaslawhopefully

17:44

@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: Out of curiosity, since you're in law school and prolly know fedsoc people, how conservative do you think you have to be to be in fedsoc? Like is a david french sort of conservative fairly common in it, or is it the maga type people mainly

KnowledgeableRitzyWasp

17:46

i dont interact with any fedsoc people, but i dont know any maga people at cornell. but the student body overwhelmingly leans left, so i think they might not be comfortable showing that theyre conservative if that makes sense?

KnowledgeableRitzyWasp

17:46

one time a guy kind of crashed out about masks in conlaw

KnowledgeableRitzyWasp

17:46

but that's the most ive seen

texaslawhopefully

17:47

Yeah, that does make sense. I would like to join fedsoc, but I'm also, clearly, very opposed to Trump and where the GOP has gone.

KnowledgeableRitzyWasp

17:48

if you join fedsoc and go for clerking and eventually become a judge. you will be pinholed into maga politics as long as maga is the predominant conservative stance

SaddestPortlander

17:50

Idk if @irishdinosaur is online but congrats on UCLA!!

LawIsForPeasants

17:55

next you will say you want to be the first black kkk grand wizard

IrishDinosaur

17:56

@SaddestPortlander: tysm!!!!

texaslawhopefully

18:00

yes congrats irishdinosaur! that's incredible

oakenrays

18:03

@IrishDinosaur: you inspire me and my completely misguided cope that I might ever get into UCLA

ImpartialLion

18:05

Super big congrats irish!!!

ImpartialLion

18:06

Also pretty much agree with Wasp. I think it’s more about getting the political/judicial position as a Fedsoc member that will likely require a stance siding with whatever the conservative majority party is at that time.

texaslawhopefully

18:07

Yeah, that's fair. I guess I need to think about it more assuming I start law school in the fall. I really want to clerk and that seems like the best option.

ImpartialLion

18:07

BUT i think once you get the position, you’ll have more leeway in making decisions more liberally. Sort of like how ACB and Gorsuch sometimes swing left after being portreayed in the media as far right (not sure if that was actually the case though).

ImpartialLion

18:09

From the perspective of someone who interned at the White House, I will add that my bosses always told me to “be careful about my resume.” Don’t want to align with any org that doesn’t fit your values because you won’t be trusted by the other side until you show them you’re legit again, and word travels in DC.

texaslawhopefully

18:10

I mean I highly highly doubt I'll become a federal judge, it's more just about getting a leg up in getting opportunities in the first place

ImpartialLion

18:10

Not sure how that true that is in practice and sorry for the long messages💀

LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.