Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Bush v. Gore (2000)

Read a random definition: masking

A quick definition of Bush v. Gore (2000):

Bush v. Gore (2000) was a court case about the recount of votes in Florida during the presidential election in 2000. George W. Bush won the election by a small margin, but Al Gore challenged the results and asked for a manual recount of the votes. The Supreme Court of Florida agreed with Gore, but there were no clear rules for how to do the recount. The Supreme Court of the United States decided that the recount was not fair because there were no clear rules, and that the Florida Supreme Court could not make new election laws. This decision made some people lose trust in the voting process and made some people think that the Supreme Court was not fair.

A more thorough explanation:

Bush v. Gore (2000) was a case that went to the Supreme Court about the recount of votes in Florida during the 2000 presidential election. George W. Bush won the election by a small margin, and Florida law required a recount of the votes. However, the recount was done by machines and excluded many votes. Al Gore then asked for a manual recount, but there were no clear guidelines for how to do this. The Supreme Court of Florida agreed with Gore and said that a manual recount was necessary.

However, George W. Bush asked the Supreme Court to stop the recount and review the case. The Supreme Court decided that the lack of clear guidelines for the manual recount violated the Equal Protection Clause. They also said that the Florida Supreme Court did not have the power to create new election laws, which is a power reserved for the state legislature. Therefore, the previous outcome of the election, with Bush as the winner, stood.

The impact of this case was that many people lost trust in the voting process. Some people thought that the Supreme Court was not an independent judicial body and was influenced by politics.

During the 2000 presidential election, George W. Bush won Florida by only a few hundred votes. This triggered an automatic recount of the votes, but the recount was done by machines and excluded many votes. Al Gore asked for a manual recount, but there were no clear guidelines for how to do this. The Supreme Court of Florida agreed with Gore and said that a manual recount was necessary. However, George W. Bush asked the Supreme Court to stop the recount and review the case. The Supreme Court decided that the lack of clear guidelines for the manual recount violated the Equal Protection Clause. They also said that the Florida Supreme Court did not have the power to create new election laws, which is a power reserved for the state legislature. Therefore, the previous outcome of the election, with Bush as the winner, stood.

This example illustrates how the case of Bush v. Gore (2000) was about the recount of votes in Florida during the 2000 presidential election. It also shows how the Supreme Court decided that the lack of clear guidelines for the manual recount violated the Equal Protection Clause and that the Florida Supreme Court did not have the power to create new election laws.

burial insurance | business

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
windyMagician
19:20
we had bill clinton already
Dkk
19:21
Bill Clinton, first and last black president
windyMagician
19:23
I want to go running but my leg feels weird
windyMagician
19:23
it doesn't hurt its just tingly
Dkk
19:26
It needs more alcohol. You tingle when your nerves need watering.
19:27
try stretching it maybe to see what's up
windyMagician
19:27
stretches make me think it's just soreness
windyMagician
19:27
I'm sober lol
Dkk
19:38
Anyone else get the google notification that your LSD password has been compromised lol. LSD got hacked.
20:48
what.jpg @Dkk
CynicalOops
21:03
You think you just fell out of a coconut tree?
jackfrost11770
21:10
nope dk
CynicalOops
22:37
Calvinamala Harris
jackfrost11770
23:16
should i start using letterboxed again
Dkk
23:25
@jackfrost11770: if you want but like it aint for me
dk do u ever eat at bk
Dkk
23:48
@chickenburgahfart: I would do that in the Army if really desperate for food or if I had to work through lunch. One of the few fast food places I go to.
bk so slept on
Dkk
0:23
I will take In N Out everyday over it when I can though.
texaslawhopefully
1:22
In N Out is not only the best fast food place, but the prices too are fantastic
Dkk
1:27
Indeed, indeed.
BulbasaurNoLikeCardio
7:51
@texaslawhopefully: best prices and only fast food that doesn't make me sick
matt gaetz ethics report released
paid for sex with a junior in high school
guarantee people still defend him
BulbasaurNoLikeCardio
9:51
I only read headlines and skimmed a random article of it since I am the only one at work this week. Seems like he is Republican Hunter Biden but not at the paying rent with poop paintings stage
ImpartialLion
9:55
Sent in my transcript at 6 am today and it’s processing. Think it will be processed before lsac closes tmrw?
BulbasaurNoLikeCardio
9:58
I would say it is a toss up, for how much LSAC charges us for everything they are extremely efficient in processing and sending stuff out BUT with a 30% uptake in applicants and the holidays it may be significantly slower unless it is ran through and processed by a computer program. Even if it takes them longer to process it, not like there is anyone at a school to request and review it after LSAC does their thing
Do we know if any of the t14 open at all this week
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.