Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

CAN-SPAM Act of 2003: Problematic Spamming Techniques

Read a random definition: caregiver

A quick definition of CAN-SPAM Act of 2003: Problematic Spamming Techniques:

The CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 is a law that says people can't send spam emails that use certain bad techniques. These techniques include: 1) getting email addresses from websites that don't allow it, 2) sending emails to lots of made-up email addresses hoping some are real, 3) making many email accounts just to send spam, and 4) using someone else's computer to send spam without permission. The government can also make more rules about bad spamming techniques.

A more thorough explanation:

The CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 is a law that regulates commercial email messages and prohibits certain spamming techniques. Section 5(b) of the Act identifies four problematic techniques that are subject to enhanced legal penalties:

  1. Address Harvesting: This is when spammers use an automatic program or process to collect email addresses from a website or online service that does not share its users' emails. For example, a spammer might use a program to scrape email addresses from a social media site.
  2. Dictionary Attacks: This is when spammers send messages to a series of automatically generated email addresses (such as john1@example.com, john2@example.com, john3@example.com) in the hope that some of them will belong to real people. For example, a spammer might use a program to generate email addresses based on common names and send spam to all of them.
  3. Automated creation of multiple email accounts: This is when spammers create multiple email accounts for the purpose of sending spam. For example, a spammer might use a program to create hundreds of email accounts and use them to send spam messages.
  4. Unauthorized access to another computer: This is when spammers hijack another person's computer and use it to send spam messages that violate the CAN-SPAM Act. For example, a spammer might use malware to take control of someone's computer and use it to send spam without the owner's knowledge.

The CAN-SPAM Act also gives the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) the power to identify additional problematic spamming techniques through its rulemaking process.

These examples illustrate how spammers use various techniques to collect email addresses and send spam messages. These techniques are prohibited by the CAN-SPAM Act because they can be harmful to individuals and businesses that receive unwanted and unsolicited emails. By regulating these practices, the Act aims to reduce the amount of spam that people receive and protect their privacy and security.

CAN-SPAM Act of 2003: Private Right of Action for "Internet Access Service" Providers | CAN-SPAM Act of 2003: Role of the Federal Trade Commission

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
14:30
Sent an app to OSU in early december and have STILL not heard back
Give it 4 more weeks at least. Everyone in this chat needs to wait longer.
TrumpSucks
19:58
@steelrift99: Same for me at Arizona
TrumpSucks
20:00
It is frustrating when people are admitted who applied after you. But that’s just part of the game I guess
was friday a umich R wave?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.