Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

capital asset

Read a random definition: case abstract

A quick definition of capital asset:

Capital asset: A capital asset is something a business owns that they plan to use to make money for more than a year. These things are usually physical objects like land, buildings, and machines. On a balance sheet, they are called property, plant, and equipment. The business can take a little bit of money off the value of the asset each year, which is called depreciation.

A more thorough explanation:

Capital Asset

Capital assets are things a business owns that are used to make money and are expected to last for more than a year. They are usually physical things that can't be easily turned into cash. On a balance sheet, capital assets are shown as property, plant, and equipment (PP&E). Examples of capital assets include:

  • Land
  • Buildings
  • Machinery

Businesses can spread out the cost of capital assets over their expected useful life. This is called depreciation.

Capital assets are things that a business owns that are used to make money. They are different from things like inventory or cash, which are used up or spent quickly. Capital assets are expected to last for more than a year, so they are usually physical things that can't be easily turned into cash. Examples of capital assets include land, buildings, and machinery. These things are used by a business to make money, and they are expected to last for a long time. Businesses can spread out the cost of capital assets over their expected useful life, which is called depreciation. This helps businesses to account for the cost of these assets over time.

capital account | capital case

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.