Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

cash budget

Read a random definition: separation a mensa et thoro

A quick definition of cash budget:

Cash budget: A plan that shows how much money a business has at the beginning of a period, how much money it expects to get, how much money it plans to spend, and how much money it will have left at the end of the period. It helps the business predict how much money it will have in the future.

A more thorough explanation:

A cash budget is a financial plan that outlines a business's expected cash inflows and outflows over a specific period. It is a period-by-period schedule that shows the opening cash balance, estimated cash receipts, cash disbursements, and closing cash balance.

For example, let's say a business wants to create a cash budget for the next quarter. They estimate that they will have $10,000 in cash at the beginning of the quarter. They also expect to receive $50,000 in cash from sales and $5,000 in cash from other sources. Their estimated cash disbursements for the quarter include $30,000 for inventory, $10,000 for rent, $5,000 for utilities, and $5,000 for salaries. Based on these estimates, the business's closing cash balance for the quarter would be $15,000.

The purpose of a cash budget is to help businesses manage their cash flow effectively. By forecasting their cash inflows and outflows, businesses can identify potential cash shortages and take steps to address them before they become a problem. For example, if a business's cash budget shows that they will have a cash shortfall in a particular month, they may decide to delay a purchase or negotiate better payment terms with their suppliers.

cash book | cash collateral

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.