Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

cashier's check

Read a random definition: danelaw

A quick definition of cashier's check:

A cashier's check is a special type of check that a bank creates and guarantees. When someone buys a cashier's check, they give the bank the money for the check plus a fee. The bank then creates a check for that amount, made out to the person or organization the buyer wants to pay. The bank guarantees that the check will be good, so the person or organization can be sure they will get the money.

A more thorough explanation:

A cashier’s check is a type of check that is guaranteed by the bank that issues it. It is a secure way to make large payments because the bank verifies that the funds are available before issuing the check.

The bank draws the check on itself, meaning that the bank is both the drawer and the drawee. The bank is responsible for paying the amount of the check to the person or organization named as the payee.

John wants to buy a car from Sarah, but the car costs $10,000, which is too much to pay in cash. Instead, John goes to his bank and requests a cashier’s check for $10,000 made out to Sarah. The bank verifies that John has enough money in his account to cover the check and issues the cashier’s check to him. John gives the check to Sarah, who can be confident that the check will clear because it is guaranteed by the bank.

Another example is when a person needs to make a down payment on a house. The seller may require a cashier’s check to ensure that the funds are available and the payment is secure.

These examples illustrate how a cashier’s check is a secure way to make large payments because the bank verifies that the funds are available before issuing the check.

cash surrender value | castle doctrine

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.