Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

cf.

Read a random definition: general jurisdiction

A quick definition of cf.:

Term: cf.

Definition: Cf. is a short way of saying "compare." It's used to show that a source supports a different idea than what was just said. It's important to compare the two ideas and see how they're different. If a source is marked with cf., it doesn't mean it contradicts what was just said, but it's worth looking at to see how it's related. If a source does contradict what was just said, a negative signal should be used instead.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Cf. is an abbreviation for the Latin word confer, which means "compare." It is used to signal that the cited source supports a different claim than the one just made, and that it is worthwhile to compare the two claims and assess the difference. When using cf., it is encouraged to provide parenthetical explanations to explain how the source relates to the text. It is important to note that a cf. source simply offers a different yet non-contradictory claim, and actual support to the claim just made should not be assumed. If the source gives a contradictory claim, a negative signal should be used.

Example 1: "The study found that eating a diet high in fruits and vegetables can reduce the risk of heart disease. Cf. another study that found no significant difference in heart disease risk between those who ate a high fruit and vegetable diet and those who did not." In this example, the use of cf. signals that there is a different claim being made in the other study, and it is worth comparing the two claims to assess the difference.

Example 2: "The author argues that the death penalty is an effective deterrent to crime. Cf. a study that found no evidence to support this claim." In this example, the use of cf. signals that there is a contradictory claim being made in the study, and a negative signal should be used to indicate that the claim is not supported.

These examples illustrate how cf. is used to signal a different claim and encourage comparison and assessment of the difference between claims. It is important to use cf. carefully and accurately to avoid assuming support for a claim that may not be present in the cited source.

certiorari | chain of title

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
13:34
as far as i know, that information is simply for data collection purposes
^
13:34
i don't think it has a detrimental effect on your chances of admission
13:34
but also you don't need to tell them anything so lol
Can y'all help me understand something lol. What does it mean for an app to "go complete"? Is that when the school has reviewed it and made a decision?
13:35
Na, it's when they have all the required information
Gotcha. So what would be the difference between received and completed?
Does complete entail like the app + LORs?
13:35
correct
That makes sense. Thank you!
13:36
complete basically means they've acknowledged receipt and it's ready to go under review whenever they start the deliberative process
Quillinit
13:40
I still haven't had Chicago or Cornell go complete, but I think that's just how they be
13:41
when did you submit
CaringEquableGuppy
13:42
How do you know when an application is complete? Is it on LSAC or the school's portal?
13:43
it'll be on the school-specific portal
Quillinit
13:44
when they opened
Quillinit
13:45
they both say something along the lines of "received and waiting to be processed"
13:48
anyone have good resources for revising a personal statement for reuse after applying with it last cycle?
13:49
Any guesses when Cornell and Penn CRS fee waivers will go out?
13:51
@Quillinit: from my recollection, chicago and cornell collapse complete/UR1 into a single step, so they may simply not be ready to begin reviewing applications
13:52
i think it's fair to assume, barring a handful of schools like UVA, most schools won't begin reviewing applications in earnest until the beginning of next month at the earliest, so it wouldn't be surprising to hear that applications are just sitting in the queue
13:54
@oakenrays: I was just gonna write a new one personally but I think you want to make it recognizably different from your previous PS
13:56
@baddestbunny: definitely agree that some revision and additional information is warranted but, my why law is the same... I guess just tell the same story in a different way
14:03
ugh fineeee I'll write a new stupid essay
14:07
yeah I told my last essay about a formative experience and am trying to update it now to be about what I’ve learned since that experience
recently wrapped up interview
i re-wrote my PS this cycle when I reapplied
fire drill at work
so lit
Quillinit
15:10
oh fun @info-man, Chicago just changed to complete today, so we'll see
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.