Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

change of circumstances

Read a random definition: ship broker

A quick definition of change of circumstances:

A change of circumstances means that something important has happened that makes it necessary to change a previous decision about child support, spousal support, or custody. This change must be big and unexpected, and it must affect the financial needs of the person receiving support or the financial abilities of the person paying support. When it comes to custody, the change can be about anything that affects what is best for the child. In California, a new custody arrangement will only be made if it is better for the child than the previous one.

A more thorough explanation:

A change of circumstances refers to a situation where a party wants to modify a previous child support, spousal support, or custody order. This change must be significant and due to facts that were not known or expected when the previous order was issued.

For example, if a parent loses their job or has a significant decrease in income, they may request a modification of child support payments. In Pennsylvania, a support order can be increased or decreased if there is a material and substantial change in a party's income.

When modifying custody orders, courts may consider non-financial circumstances that affect the child's best interests. For instance, if a parent has a history of substance abuse or domestic violence, the court may modify the custody order to protect the child's safety and well-being.

California specifies that final custody orders will only be modified when there has been a change in circumstances such that a new arrangement is best for the child. For example, if a parent moves to a different state, the court may modify the custody order to ensure that the child's needs are met.

chancery | channels

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.