Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Claflin-trust principle

Read a random definition: Erie doctrine

A quick definition of Claflin-trust principle:

The Claflin-trust principle is a rule that says a trust cannot be ended by the people who benefit from it if ending it would go against what the person who made the trust wanted. This means that even if everyone who benefits from the trust wants it to end, it might not be allowed to end if the person who made the trust had a good reason for making it. This rule is often called "deadhand control" because it means that the wishes of the person who made the trust are more important than the wishes of the people who benefit from it. Some types of trusts that fall under this rule include trusts where the person in charge can decide how to give out the money, trusts that are meant to support someone, and trusts where the person who benefits gets money until they reach a certain age.

A more thorough explanation:

The Claflin-trust principle is a legal doctrine that states that a trust cannot be terminated by the beneficiaries if doing so would go against the settlor's original intentions for creating the trust. This means that even if all the beneficiaries want to end the trust, they cannot do so if it would defeat one of the settlor's material purposes in establishing the trust.

The Claflin rule comes from a court case called Claflin v. Claflin, which was decided in Massachusetts in 1889. This case is often cited as an example of "deadhand control," which means that the wishes of the settlor, who is now deceased, are more important than the needs and desires of the living beneficiaries.

Examples of trusts that fall under the Claflin category include:

  • Spendthrift trusts
  • Support trusts
  • Trusts in which the trustee has discretion to make distributions
  • Trusts in which the beneficiary is entitled to income until a certain age, at which point they will receive the principal

For instance, if a wealthy parent sets up a trust for their child's education and specifies that the trust can only be used for tuition and related expenses, the child cannot terminate the trust if they want to use the money for something else, like buying a car. Even if all the beneficiaries agree to end the trust, they cannot do so if it would go against the settlor's original intentions.

CL | claim and delivery

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
17:41
@LawIsForPeasants: ok, sorry, I will not bother u while u 'self validate yourself in the corner' my bad.
@llama: im self validating so hard rn
17:42
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: thats very ithica of you, wasp.
texaslawhopefully
17:44
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: Out of curiosity, since you're in law school and prolly know fedsoc people, how conservative do you think you have to be to be in fedsoc? Like is a david french sort of conservative fairly common in it, or is it the maga type people mainly
i dont interact with any fedsoc people, but i dont know any maga people at cornell. but the student body overwhelmingly leans left, so i think they might not be comfortable showing that theyre conservative if that makes sense?
one time a guy kind of crashed out about masks in conlaw
but that's the most ive seen
texaslawhopefully
17:47
Yeah, that does make sense. I would like to join fedsoc, but I'm also, clearly, very opposed to Trump and where the GOP has gone.
if you join fedsoc and go for clerking and eventually become a judge. you will be pinholed into maga politics as long as maga is the predominant conservative stance
Idk if @irishdinosaur is online but congrats on UCLA!!
next you will say you want to be the first black kkk grand wizard
@SaddestPortlander: tysm!!!!
texaslawhopefully
18:00
yes congrats irishdinosaur! that's incredible
18:03
@IrishDinosaur: you inspire me and my completely misguided cope that I might ever get into UCLA
Super big congrats irish!!!
Also pretty much agree with Wasp. I think it’s more about getting the political/judicial position as a Fedsoc member that will likely require a stance siding with whatever the conservative majority party is at that time.
texaslawhopefully
18:07
Yeah, that's fair. I guess I need to think about it more assuming I start law school in the fall. I really want to clerk and that seems like the best option.
BUT i think once you get the position, you’ll have more leeway in making decisions more liberally. Sort of like how ACB and Gorsuch sometimes swing left after being portreayed in the media as far right (not sure if that was actually the case though).
From the perspective of someone who interned at the White House, I will add that my bosses always told me to “be careful about my resume.” Don’t want to align with any org that doesn’t fit your values because you won’t be trusted by the other side until you show them you’re legit again, and word travels in DC.
texaslawhopefully
18:10
I mean I highly highly doubt I'll become a federal judge, it's more just about getting a leg up in getting opportunities in the first place
Not sure how that true that is in practice and sorry for the long messages💀
texaslawhopefully
18:10
And, yeah, that's fair. Right now my resume probably looks like it's from someone who is center-right
Honestly, it just depends on your values. If you ever see yourself being a dem member in any capacity, then MAYBE stay away. But like you just said, there’s a possibility to look moderate with the right WE post law school.
texaslawhopefully
18:12
Yeah, that's true as well. As a side note, it's very cool you interned with the white house, I know those internships are incredibly hard to get
Dkk
18:12
A lot of conservativism right now is also just be as aggressive and unwilling to compromise in decision making right now because the left is out there in lets appeal to 1% of the population land so proposals brought to the table by them are 1, insane and 2, all or nothing proposals with no compromise.
Dkk
18:12
It's a bad time to be partisan really in any way.
I had to apply 4 times and got off the WL so I barely got it. It was a cool exp but def not any work crazier than you would see on capitol hill or any political org imo.
texaslawhopefully
18:14
It def looks great on your resume though
Yeah thats why i did it😂 it was a crazy time bcuz i had to commute from 2 hrs away since i was paying rent in madison and i couldnt afford another apt in DC
Never again.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.