Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

cohabitation agreement

Read a random definition: capitation tax

A quick definition of cohabitation agreement:

A cohabitation agreement is a document that two people who live together can sign to decide how they will share their money and property. It's like a plan for how they will take care of things if they ever decide to separate. It's also called a living-together agreement and is similar to a prenuptial agreement.

A more thorough explanation:

A cohabitation agreement is a legal contract that outlines the financial and property arrangements between two people who live together but are not married. It is also known as a living-together agreement. This agreement is similar to a prenuptial agreement, but it is for couples who are not married.

Example 1: John and Jane have been living together for five years. They decide to create a cohabitation agreement to protect their individual assets and clarify their financial responsibilities. The agreement outlines how they will split expenses, who owns what property, and what will happen if they decide to separate.

Example 2: Sarah and Tom have been dating for a year and decide to move in together. Before they do, they create a cohabitation agreement to protect their individual assets and clarify their financial responsibilities. The agreement outlines how they will split expenses, who owns what property, and what will happen if they decide to separate.

These examples illustrate how a cohabitation agreement can help couples who live together but are not married to protect their individual assets and clarify their financial responsibilities. It can also help them avoid legal disputes if they decide to separate.

COGSA | cohabiting unmarried person of the opposite sex

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.