Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

color of law

Read a random definition: pars ejusdem negotii

A quick definition of color of law:

Color of law refers to when someone appears to have the legal right to do something, but they actually do not. This is often used to describe when someone in power abuses their authority and does something illegal. It is against the law to do this. The Civil Rights Act of 1871 gave people the right to sue government officials who violate their civil rights. An example of this is when banks used to refuse to give loans to people in certain neighborhoods just because of their race, which is called redlining.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Color of law refers to the appearance of legal authority or an apparently legal right that may not actually exist. This term is often used to describe the abuse of power under the guise of state authority, which is illegal.

The term "color of law" was used in the Civil Rights Act of 1871, where it referred to an official whose conduct was so closely associated with a state that the conduct was deemed to be the action of that state. This Act grants citizens the right to sue government officials and their agents for using their power to violate civil rights.

One example of color of law is the practice of redlining, which was a discriminatory practice used by banks and other financial institutions to deny loans or insurance to people based on their race or ethnicity. This practice was illegal, but it was often disguised as a legitimate business practice.

For example, in Syracuse, New York, a map was created in the 1930s that showed which neighborhoods were considered "hazardous" for lending purposes. These neighborhoods were predominantly African American and immigrant communities, and they were denied access to loans and other financial services. This was a clear example of color of law, as it was a discriminatory practice that was disguised as a legitimate business practice.

color | color of office

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
18:21
Home of crime, poopy sidewalks, and needles. But a decent school
babycat
18:21
i did my tenth application today :)
18:22
wow congratz- sigh of relief?
18:22
congrats!! and good to know llama. why are their 'chance' numbers so weird for my stats...
18:22
hi all !!
babycat
18:22
@ChowieBean: yield protect?
18:23
do u guys have any recommendations for any LSAT prep websites that wont break my wallet
18:23
i rly liked powerscore! and babycat maybe yeah
18:24
ty :') ive been looking for some prep material but I've seen some where they're like $500 plus for prep material
18:25
7sage, lsatdemon, lsat hacks. check them out it seems like diff ppl have a preference. most offer free trial
babycat
18:25
7sage is $1/month if you can get fee waiver
babycat
18:26
that’s the first thing you should know. apply for a fee waiver through LSAC and it applies to some test prep companies too
@K0zhii: I would recommend LSAT Demon (they also have a fee waiver version) & the Loophole
I personally did not like 7Sage, but since it is so cheap w/ fee waiver it might be worth trying
18:34
@K0zhii: to summarize: 1: https://www.lsac.org/lsat/register-lsat/lsat-cas-fees/fee-waiver 2. check out the above mentioned prep companies, sign up/ 'try them on' and see if you have a preference (they are all a little different). 3. If you get an LSAC fee waiver, you can then use it to get discounted access to the prep companies. Hope this helps!
18:41
ugh berkeley public interest scholars is binding. idk what to do
18:41
what do u guys think with my stats. ED berk worth it or nah
18:41
bunny^? idk apply and cross that bridge when u get there imo but im clueless.
18:43
what a difficult decision hm. gotta research berk more ig
18:43
hey did u take the Nov lsat Chowie?
18:43
binding scares me but its the only chance at a full ride. and no i didnt i canceled
I mean it is not a bad option, unless you're shooting for HYS or something.
18:44
yeah harvard is def my dream
18:45
I believe regarding PI binding @ NYU? we came to the conclusion that: if you get it, it is binding IF u accept it, after you are admitted, chances are at that point u would know (likely) outcome @ other options. can anyone confirm?
@ChowieBean: Well if HLS is your dream, then don't apply binding somewhere else—at least I wouldn't do that.
18:47
yes i'm sure that one's binding if you accept. and yeah i probably wont bind to berkeley but i want to still write a public interest essay for them
18:54
I wish eggan jackfrost wasp bunny where here to input some knowledge since they are PI focused. texas seems right- it just really depends on the margin of utility u see in each school, if u are deadest on HLS- likely dont do anything binding to other schools?
18:56
agree i just feel like it's such a pipe dream for HLS to be dream school
PerpetualCheerfulBeaver
18:58
yall think there will be A's sent tomorrow? or that it will be after thanksgiving
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.