Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

common appurtenant

Read a random definition: XR

A quick definition of common appurtenant:

A common appurtenant is a legal right that allows someone to use another person's property, such as land, for a specific purpose. This could be grazing animals or digging up earth. There are different types of common appurtenants, including common appendant, which is a tenant's right to graze animals on the landowner's land, and common appurtenant, which is a landowner's right to graze animals on another's land as a result of a written grant relating to the ownership or occupancy of land.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: A legal right to use another person's property, such as an easement. It can be of three types:

  1. Common appendant: A tenant's right to graze animals on the landowner's land as a result of long-standing practice.
  2. Common appurtenant: A landowner's right to graze animals on another's land as a result of a written grant relating to the ownership or occupancy of land.
  3. Common in gross: A right to graze animals on another's land as a result of a written grant unrelated to ownership or occupancy of land.

Examples:

  • A farmer has a common appurtenant right to graze his cattle on his neighbor's land as per a written agreement between them.
  • A village has a common appendant right to graze their animals on a nearby field as per a long-standing tradition.
  • A company has a common in gross right to extract minerals from a land they do not own as per a written agreement with the landowner.

The examples illustrate the different types of common appurtenant rights that can exist between landowners and tenants or neighbors. These rights are legally binding and can be enforced in court if necessary.

common appendant | common assurance

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.