Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

condition subsequent

Read a random definition: due course, payment in

A quick definition of condition subsequent:

A condition subsequent is a rule that says if something happens, then one person doesn't have to do what they promised anymore. It's different from a condition precedent because it happens after someone has already agreed to do something. This rule is often used in contracts and property. In contracts, it lets people get out of their promises if something bad happens in the future. For example, a trash company might promise to pick up a town's garbage for five years, but only if the amount of garbage doesn't go up by more than 5% each year. If it does, the trash company doesn't have to keep picking up the garbage. In property, a condition subsequent is a rule that lets someone take back their property if something happens. For example, if someone gives their son a piece of land, but says that if he gets divorced, the land goes to their nephew instead, then the son can lose the land if he gets divorced.

A more thorough explanation:

A condition subsequent is an event or situation that, if it happens, will end one party's obligation to the other. It is different from a condition precedent because it takes effect after a party has already taken on a duty or after an interest has already vested. These conditions are often found in contracts and property law.

Contract Example: A trash collection company agrees to collect a town's trash for five years, as long as the total amount of trash does not increase by more than 5% each year. If the town's trash grows by more than 5% in any year during the contract, the condition subsequent will take effect, and the trash collection company will no longer have a duty to collect the town's trash.

Property Example: A grant gives the property Blackacre "to our son, but if he gets divorced, to our nephew." The son's agreement not to divorce is a condition subsequent. At the time the grant is executed, Blackacre transfers to the son. If the son ever gets divorced, the nephew can, but is not required to, exercise their right of entry and seize ownership of Blackacre.

These examples illustrate how a condition subsequent can be used to end a party's obligation or to divest someone of their property rights if a certain event or situation occurs.

condition precedent | conditional bequest

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.