Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

conspiracy

Read a random definition: National Science Foundation

A quick definition of conspiracy:

Conspiracy is when two or more people agree to do something illegal and plan to make it happen. They have to take some action towards making it happen. If they succeed, they can be punished for the crime they committed. If they fail, they can still be punished for trying to do it. Everyone involved can be punished, even if they didn't do anything themselves. Conspiracy can be for any kind of crime, like murder or stealing.

A more thorough explanation:

Conspiracy is when two or more people agree to do something illegal and plan to achieve their goal. In most places in the United States, there also needs to be an action taken towards the illegal act. This is called an "overt act."

If someone is part of a conspiracy, they can be punished even if they didn't directly do anything illegal. This is called "derivative liability." This means that if someone in the conspiracy does something illegal to help the group, everyone in the conspiracy can be punished for it.

Conspiracy can be punished on its own, or it can be punished along with the illegal act that was planned. For example, if someone conspired to rob a bank, they could be punished for both the conspiracy and the robbery.

Conspiracy can be used for both criminal and civil offenses. For example, someone could conspire to commit murder or to commit fraud.

  • A group of people plan to rob a bank. They agree on a plan and each person has a specific role. They also take steps towards carrying out the plan, like buying weapons and practicing their escape route. This is an example of conspiracy.
  • Two people agree to cheat on a test. They plan to share answers and help each other during the test. This is also an example of conspiracy, even though cheating on a test is not a criminal offense.

These examples illustrate how conspiracy involves planning and agreeing to do something illegal or against the rules. It also shows how even if someone doesn't directly do something illegal, they can still be punished for being part of the plan.

consortium | conspirator

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
13:34
i don't think it has a detrimental effect on your chances of admission
13:34
but also you don't need to tell them anything so lol
Can y'all help me understand something lol. What does it mean for an app to "go complete"? Is that when the school has reviewed it and made a decision?
13:35
Na, it's when they have all the required information
Gotcha. So what would be the difference between received and completed?
Does complete entail like the app + LORs?
13:35
correct
That makes sense. Thank you!
13:36
complete basically means they've acknowledged receipt and it's ready to go under review whenever they start the deliberative process
Quillinit
13:40
I still haven't had Chicago or Cornell go complete, but I think that's just how they be
13:41
when did you submit
CaringEquableGuppy
13:42
How do you know when an application is complete? Is it on LSAC or the school's portal?
13:43
it'll be on the school-specific portal
Quillinit
13:44
when they opened
Quillinit
13:45
they both say something along the lines of "received and waiting to be processed"
13:48
anyone have good resources for revising a personal statement for reuse after applying with it last cycle?
13:49
Any guesses when Cornell and Penn CRS fee waivers will go out?
13:51
@Quillinit: from my recollection, chicago and cornell collapse complete/UR1 into a single step, so they may simply not be ready to begin reviewing applications
13:52
i think it's fair to assume, barring a handful of schools like UVA, most schools won't begin reviewing applications in earnest until the beginning of next month at the earliest, so it wouldn't be surprising to hear that applications are just sitting in the queue
13:54
@oakenrays: I was just gonna write a new one personally but I think you want to make it recognizably different from your previous PS
13:56
@baddestbunny: definitely agree that some revision and additional information is warranted but, my why law is the same... I guess just tell the same story in a different way
14:03
ugh fineeee I'll write a new stupid essay
14:07
yeah I told my last essay about a formative experience and am trying to update it now to be about what I’ve learned since that experience
recently wrapped up interview
i re-wrote my PS this cycle when I reapplied
fire drill at work
so lit
Quillinit
15:10
oh fun @info-man, Chicago just changed to complete today, so we'll see
boglue
15:23
do you have to have lawhub advantage for the lsd status checker to work
lawhub kind of a freaky ass name now that i think about it
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.