Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Constitutions of Clarendon

Read a random definition: disponee

A quick definition of Constitutions of Clarendon:

The Constitutions of Clarendon were a set of rules made in the 12th century during the reign of King Henry II. They were created to limit the power of the church courts and make sure that religious leaders were not above the law. The king offered these rules to the church leaders, but they were rejected by Thomas Becket, who was later murdered. After this, the courts run by the king became more powerful than the church courts.

A more thorough explanation:

The Constitutions of Clarendon were a set of laws created in the 12th century during the reign of King Henry II. They were meant to limit the power of the church courts and make sure that clergy members were subject to the same laws as everyone else.

For example, one of the laws stated that if a clergy member committed a crime, they would be tried in a secular court instead of a church court. This was a big change because before the Constitutions of Clarendon, clergy members were often exempt from secular justice.

The Constitutions of Clarendon were a major source of conflict between King Henry II and Thomas Becket, the Archbishop of Canterbury. Becket refused to accept the laws, which led to a long and bitter dispute between the two men.

Overall, the Constitutions of Clarendon were an important step in the development of English law and helped to establish the power of the secular courts over the church courts.

constitutiones principum | constitutor

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
14:30
Sent an app to OSU in early december and have STILL not heard back
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.