Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Constitutions of Clarendon

Read a random definition: debitum in praesenti solvendum in futuro

A quick definition of Constitutions of Clarendon:

The Constitutions of Clarendon were a set of rules made in the 12th century during the reign of King Henry II. They were created to limit the power of the church courts and make sure that religious leaders were not above the law. The king offered these rules to the church leaders, but they were rejected by Thomas Becket, who was later murdered. After this, the courts run by the king became more powerful than the church courts.

A more thorough explanation:

The Constitutions of Clarendon were a set of laws created in the 12th century during the reign of King Henry II. They were meant to limit the power of the church courts and make sure that clergy members were subject to the same laws as everyone else.

For example, one of the laws stated that if a clergy member committed a crime, they would be tried in a secular court instead of a church court. This was a big change because before the Constitutions of Clarendon, clergy members were often exempt from secular justice.

The Constitutions of Clarendon were a major source of conflict between King Henry II and Thomas Becket, the Archbishop of Canterbury. Becket refused to accept the laws, which led to a long and bitter dispute between the two men.

Overall, the Constitutions of Clarendon were an important step in the development of English law and helped to establish the power of the secular courts over the church courts.

constitutiones principum | constitutor

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
18:46
do u have a dream school?
18:46
well i saw one is at fordham and one is at upenn and ik fordham isnt t14 but its better than temple and villanova
18:47
dream is duke
18:47
ooh interesting choice why Duke?
18:48
i got into fordham and so did the dumbass I was dating for like two months it’s not that hard
18:48
by which I mean if they let him in I don’t trust their standards
18:49
my dad went to duke law so i have been a fan forever
18:49
Duke is fun. I took a trip there when I was 19 or so. Really good time when I was a young rapscallion.
18:49
and ik i just dont think i gave myself enough time for a guaranteed 170+ performance
18:49
I didnt see if anyone answered my UGA question. Did anyone answer it?
18:53
@Dkkm11: are you not still a young rapscallion?
19:00
Nah, I am gray-bearded wizard.
19:02
Hmmm. I guess that’s okay.
19:03
Honestly, idk what I would call myself these days. Will probably not know until I can reflect on this part of my life which will be idk, in like 5 years when I am 32.
19:06
Does your life come in 5 year epochs typically?
19:06
Someone told me a while ago that I was probably molested as a kid because I don’t really have any clear memories of my childhood. But I don’t think I was.
1a2b3c4d26z
19:10
Inside thoughts!
19:10
this is where I post my inside thoughts
19:11
Nah, the fucked up thing about therapists is they try and make you think your parents are your enemy 99% of the time and really they should be telling you that your parents have almost no effect on the rest of your life. If they can get you to keep focusing on your parents they can keep making money.
19:12
Yeah, my life really does flow in about 5 years periods.
19:12
My crypto also flows in 5 day epochs too.
19:16
what do you do with your days as an unemployed crypto guy? do you play an instrument or something
19:47
please lawd
19:47
forgive me
19:47
its time to go back to tha old me
19:50
this is what i feel like when i get one single drill question right
19:50
when u get one wrong ;(
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.