Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

contenement

Read a random definition: claim dilution

A quick definition of contenement:

Contenement is a word that has two meanings. The first meaning is about land. It is a type of land that a person owns and uses to support themselves. This type of land was protected by a law called Magna Carta, which said that it could not be taken away from the owner. The second meaning of contenement is about a person's reputation or standing in the community. This meaning comes from the word "countenance" which means how people see and think about you. So, contenement can mean the good reputation that a person has because of their land ownership.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Contenement (kən-ten-ə-mənt) is a historical term that refers to freehold land held by a feudal tenant, especially land used to support the tenant. This property was exempted from seizure by Magna Carta.

Example: A farmer who rented land from a lord would also have a small piece of land that he owned outright. This land was his contenement and could not be taken away from him, even if he owed money to the lord.

Explanation: The example illustrates how contenement was a form of protection for tenants who relied on the land to support themselves. By owning a small piece of land, they had some security and could not be completely at the mercy of their landlord.

Definition: Contenement can also refer to a person's reputation or standing in the community, which may be rooted in the ownership of land.

Example: In medieval times, a knight's contenement would include not only his land but also his armor, weapons, and other possessions that contributed to his status and reputation.

Explanation: This example shows how a person's possessions and status were closely tied to their ownership of land. A knight's armor and weapons were not just practical tools but also symbols of his social standing and power.

contempt proceeding | content-based discrimination

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
Dont agree dkk but out of messages so this is a talk for another day
17:34
@LawIsForPeasants: I just want you to know that: you matter, you are important, and finally, I am proud of you. :D
That is so fucking cringe and leave me alone
llama i appreciate you
17:35
@LawIsForPeasants: while charlie kirk's facts do not care about your feelings, just know that I do!
texaslawhopefully
17:36
@Dkk: Fair enough, but if you're using political philosophy to defend Trump, it's hard to reconcile him as a candidate with very relevant classic political theory, like Locke's individual rights and limited government as illustrated in the 2nd treatise, or the constitutional framework limiting executive power (e.g., Federalist 51). Trump's disregard for constitutional checks and populist rhetoric directly is in tension with our very foundational principles.
Dkk
17:36
@SplitterusClitterus: sounds good. Trying to paint a wine glass rn anyway after I just woke up.
Dkk
17:37
@texaslawhopefully: Psssh I would not use gender relations as a way to defend Trump. He does not go that route and I think literally him and everyone in their cabinet has no idea what those are. I mean, just look at how many divorces Elon and Trump have had.
texaslawhopefully
17:38
Was that not why you said you voted for him?
17:38
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: can I ask what “2 years retroactive withdrawals” means
17:39
elon and trump realize there are many fish in the sea, and sometimes u can't just 'make it work'
@sadpadresfan: grades changed to W for two consecutive years of classes
Dkk
17:39
Nah, I did not vote. I have never voted in my life because I have a lot of issues with it. 4 years ago my mom filled out my ballot for me because she wanted to but I do not vote.
17:40
based fellow non voter
@llama i do not need or desire external validation.
17:40
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: ah I see
17:41
@LawIsForPeasants: ok, sorry, I will not bother u while u 'self validate yourself in the corner' my bad.
@llama: im self validating so hard rn
17:42
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: thats very ithica of you, wasp.
texaslawhopefully
17:44
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: Out of curiosity, since you're in law school and prolly know fedsoc people, how conservative do you think you have to be to be in fedsoc? Like is a david french sort of conservative fairly common in it, or is it the maga type people mainly
i dont interact with any fedsoc people, but i dont know any maga people at cornell. but the student body overwhelmingly leans left, so i think they might not be comfortable showing that theyre conservative if that makes sense?
one time a guy kind of crashed out about masks in conlaw
but that's the most ive seen
texaslawhopefully
17:47
Yeah, that does make sense. I would like to join fedsoc, but I'm also, clearly, very opposed to Trump and where the GOP has gone.
if you join fedsoc and go for clerking and eventually become a judge. you will be pinholed into maga politics as long as maga is the predominant conservative stance
Idk if @irishdinosaur is online but congrats on UCLA!!
next you will say you want to be the first black kkk grand wizard
@SaddestPortlander: tysm!!!!
texaslawhopefully
18:00
yes congrats irishdinosaur! that's incredible
18:03
@IrishDinosaur: you inspire me and my completely misguided cope that I might ever get into UCLA
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.