Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

corporate opportunity

Read a random definition: jus albanagii

A quick definition of corporate opportunity:

Corporate opportunity means that people who work for a company, like bosses and directors, have to be careful not to take away good business ideas from the company for their own benefit. They have to do what's best for the company, not just for themselves. Sometimes it's hard to know if something is a corporate opportunity or not, but if it's something the company could do and it's related to what the company does, then it's probably a corporate opportunity. People who work for the company have to be honest about any conflicts of interest they have and not try to hide anything. If they do something wrong, they can get in trouble.

A more thorough explanation:

Corporate opportunity refers to the responsibility of senior executives and directors of corporations to not take business opportunities away from the corporation for their own benefit. This means that executives should not use their position within the corporation to benefit themselves at the expense of the corporation.

For example, if a director of a company learns of a potential business opportunity that would be a good fit for the company, they cannot take advantage of that opportunity for their own personal gain. Instead, they must present the opportunity to the company and allow the company to decide whether or not to pursue it.

Courts use various factors to determine whether or not a director has taken advantage of a corporate opportunity. These factors include:

  • Whether the corporation is financially able to pursue the opportunity
  • Whether the opportunity is within the corporation's line of business
  • Whether the corporation has an interest or expectancy in the opportunity
  • Whether the director's actions are in conflict with their duties to the corporation

It is important for fiduciaries to be transparent about any conflicts of interest they may have and to recuse themselves from decision-making where necessary. Courts are more likely to be critical of fiduciaries who attempt to conceal their actions in order to take advantage of corporate opportunities.

corporate officers | corporate raider

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.