Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

corporate takeover

Read a random definition: Madrid Registration of Marks Treaty

A quick definition of corporate takeover:

A corporate takeover is when one group takes control of a company from another group. This can happen in a friendly way, where both groups agree to the takeover, or in a hostile way, where one group tries to take over without the other group's permission. The group trying to take over usually offers to buy shares from the other group's shareholders for a higher price than the shares are worth. This can happen for different reasons, like wanting to expand into new industries or getting rid of competition. However, the government has to make sure that the takeover doesn't create a monopoly, where one group has too much control over a certain industry.

A more thorough explanation:

A corporate takeover is when one party gains control of a corporation from another party. There are two types of corporate takeovers: hostile and friendly. In a hostile takeover, the management of the company being taken over does not want to be taken over. In a friendly takeover, the management of the company being taken over agrees to the takeover.

When a party obtains more than 5% of a corporation's outstanding stock, they must file a report with the Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) stating whether they intend to initiate a takeover or not. If they do intend to initiate a takeover, they will release a tender offer to purchase shares from shareholders. This offer is typically above market value to incentivize shareholders to sell. The success of the takeover depends on whether enough shareholders sell their shares.

Takeovers happen for many reasons, including industry diversification, corporate raider attempts, and removal of competition. However, all takeover attempts, hostile or not, must receive clearance from the FTC to ensure that a monopoly will not result.

  • Example 1: Company A wants to take over Company B. Company A releases a tender offer to purchase shares from Company B's shareholders. If enough shareholders sell their shares, Company A gains control of Company B.
  • Example 2: Company C wants to merge with Company D. Company C and Company D's management agree to the merger, and a shareholder vote is held to determine whether to accept the terms of the merger or not.

These examples illustrate the two types of corporate takeovers: hostile and friendly. In Example 1, Company A is initiating a hostile takeover because Company B's management does not want to be taken over. In Example 2, Company C and Company D are agreeing to a friendly takeover through a merger.

corporate resolution | corporate trustee

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.