Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

course of dealing

Read a random definition: colloquy

A quick definition of course of dealing:

Course of dealing refers to the way people have acted in the past when they made deals with each other. For example, if a store always gives a 30-day warranty with their TVs, that's part of their course of dealing. This is important because it helps people understand what they can expect when they make a deal. If there's a disagreement about what a contract means, a court might look at the course of dealing to figure out what the people meant. But the course of dealing can't change what's written in the contract. Course of dealing is different from course of performance, which is about what people do after they've made a deal.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Course of dealing refers to a pattern of behavior in previous transactions that can be seen as evidence of a mutual understanding between the parties. It is relevant in contract law because it helps with the interpretation of contract terms.

For example, if a car dealer always includes a warranty with their sales, this warranty may be part of the course of dealing. If a customer buys a car from the dealer and expects a warranty, the dealer cannot later claim that there was no warranty.

However, a course of dealing cannot contradict explicit contract terms. For instance, if a contract explicitly states that there is no warranty, the course of dealing cannot be used to argue otherwise.

Course of dealing is different from course of performance, which refers to behavior after a contract has been formed. Course of dealing is concerned with behavior that occurred before the contract was formed.

County government - State statutes | course of employment

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.