Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Court of Assistants

Read a random definition: Section 103 rejection

A quick definition of Court of Assistants:

Court of Assistants: A group of people who acted as both a government and a court in the Massachusetts Bay Colony in 1630. They listened to appeals from lower courts and made decisions on certain cases, like divorces. There were also county courts below them.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: The Court of Assistants was a colonial body established in the Massachusetts Bay Colony in 1630. Its purpose was to serve as a legislature and court for the colony. The Court of Assistants was made up of the governor, deputy governor, and magistrates. It had the power to hear appeals from lower courts and take original jurisdiction in certain cases, such as cases of divorce. The county courts were below the Court of Assistants.

Example: In the Massachusetts Bay Colony, the Court of Assistants was responsible for hearing appeals from lower courts. For example, if someone was unhappy with the decision made in a county court, they could appeal to the Court of Assistants. The Court of Assistants would then review the case and make a final decision.

Explanation: The example illustrates how the Court of Assistants acted as a higher court in the Massachusetts Bay Colony. It shows how the Court of Assistants had the power to review decisions made in lower courts and make a final decision. This was an important function of the Court of Assistants, as it ensured that justice was served fairly and consistently throughout the colony.

Court of Arches | Court of Attachments

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.