Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

cross-appeal

Read a random definition: de procedendo ad judicium

A quick definition of cross-appeal:

A cross-appeal is when someone disagrees with a decision made by a lower court and asks a higher court to review it. If the first person who asked for the review is called the appellant, then the second person is called the appellee and their request is called a cross-appeal. It's like when two people are arguing in court and one person makes a claim, and then the other person makes a counterclaim. But a cross-appeal only happens if the second person wants the higher court to review something specific about the lower court's decision, not just to agree with it.

A more thorough explanation:

A cross-appeal is a legal request made by the party who did not file the initial appeal, asking a higher court to review a decision made by a lower court. The difference between an appeal and a cross-appeal is based on who filed the request for review first. The party who files the request first is called the petitioner or appellant, and their request is an appeal. If the opposing party also wants to request a review of the lower court's decision, their request is called a cross-appeal.

In a civil trial, the plaintiff files a claim against the defendant. If the defendant has claims against the plaintiff, it may file a counterclaim. Similarly, in an appeal, the party who files the request first is called the appellant, and if the opposing party also wants to request a review of the lower court's decision, their request is called a cross-appeal.

For example, in the case of Ulin v. Gallery 528 Fed.Appx. 748 (2013), the appellant filed an appeal against the lower court's decision. The appellee then filed a cross-appeal, requesting the higher court to review some aspect of the lower court's decision. This is an example of a cross-appeal.

Note that a cross-appeal only occurs when the appellee requests that the higher court review some aspect of the lower court's decision, and not just to uphold the lower court's decision.

critical stages of proceedings | cross-claim

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
jackfrost11770
14:19
Wow that's awesome nothing from vandy
GreyCeaselessMammoth
14:19
what
GreyCeaselessMammoth
14:19
fuck
renard99
14:19
@soyalmondoatmilk: Congratulations!!!
jackfrost11770
14:19
I applied in November
jackfrost11770
14:19
Idk when the As did
GreyCeaselessMammoth
14:19
does anyone know if they usually release all at once or waht
nothing
jackfrost11770
14:20
Well I hope not otherwise I'm screwed
jackfrost11770
14:21
Anderson cooper PLEASEEEEE
For ED and their last wave of decisions it was an email all at once
GreyCeaselessMammoth
14:22
ugh
gonna go cry
jackfrost11770
14:22
Ugh
jackfrost11770
14:22
:(
ReminiscentZestyFish
14:23
Small ahh wave
GreyCeaselessMammoth
14:23
yeah the smallness of this wave makes me think there might be more to come? am i being crazy? only one wave a month it should be a tsunami rn
14:24
@jackfrost11770: chillll it still early in the cycle, especially relative to this and last yearrrr
its also still early in the day
i think theres def more waves todayu
StillDoingMyBest
14:25
do y'all think the lsat is easier or harder without the logic games
[] starfishies
14:25
ppl prob need a few minutes to update their results
pee pee poo poo
if i get a decision today ill dye my hair
14:26
dye it grey plz
or ppiece a new whole
i would look terrible with grey hair
jackfrost11770
14:27
I do think that vandy does hella small waves if not even individual decisions
jackfrost11770
14:27
Tex got WL randomly and he was like, the only one
jackfrost11770
14:27
On a Sunday
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.