Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

de inofficioso testamento

Read a random definition: jocus partitus

A quick definition of de inofficioso testamento:

Term: DE INOFFICIOSO TESTAMENTO

Definition: De inofficioso testamento refers to a legal term in Roman law that deals with an undutiful or inofficious will. It is also known as querela inofficiosi testamenti. This term is used to describe a situation where a person's will does not fulfill their legal obligations towards their family members or heirs.

A more thorough explanation:

DE INOFFICIOSO TESTAMENTO

De inofficioso testamento is a Latin term used in Roman law to refer to an undutiful or inofficious will. It is a legal concept that deals with a will that does not provide for the proper maintenance of the testator's family members or heirs.

An example of de inofficioso testamento is when a wealthy person creates a will that disinherits their children or spouse without any valid reason. Another example is when a testator leaves all their property to a charity, neglecting their family members who are in need of support.

These examples illustrate how de inofficioso testamento is concerned with the proper distribution of a testator's property and assets. The law requires that a will should provide for the maintenance and support of the testator's family members and heirs, and any will that fails to do so may be challenged in court.

de injuria | de integro

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
ED --> RD at CLS Waitlist at Fordham below both medians at both. Should i be hopeful for next cycle if i retake my LSAT and get my score up? no hard rejections so far, has to mean something right? LOL im going crazy
higher lsat makes everything way easier
but the fact that both schools didn’t R you means that you’re at least a competitive applicant
jackfrost11770
13:49
HI WASPY :)
probably my WE and softs. Do reapplicants have lower chances at admissions? I've read few negative things but I dont wanna like poison my brain with those lol.
Also, do i have to write new personal statements if i reapply?
hi jack :)
calling dean cooper as we speak to get you an A
you do have to write new personal statements but applicants aren’t disfavored
especially if you’re reapplying with a higher lsat
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: i just looked at your stats and do not take this the wrong way in any way but how the hell did nyu or cls not take you. this is insane
178 lsat is a crazy work dude
i had a silly guy era and had two years of withdrawn classes. like 15 total, so a lot of schools were not willing to take a chance on me
soap
13:55
If you're already on the WL when you get a higher LSAT, are you already cooked?
their loss lol. any tips for LSAT LR? I used 7sage and kinda hated it. I have Loophole that I plan on using whenever I retake lsat probably in summer
@soap: you are more cooked than if you were not already waitlisted, but you are not completely cooked and raising your lsat is the strongest thing you can do for a WL
soap
13:58
Volatile, I always do the hardest ones first, so that you get the most challenging questions out of the way and make it get easier as you proceed. Also, read the answer choices before reading the question.
soap
13:58
Man if I get above 175 and end up not getting into any t14s I'll laugh
@VolatileClumsyAcolyte: biggest tip that will get you a few points is that the LSAT doesn’t actually use “most correct” like it claims. there’s actually only ever one right answer and every other answer will be excluded by one rule of logic or another. so only one answer will ever be completely correct
is there like a cheat sheet or a study guide type of thing for specific forms of questions? I remember I struggled the most with NA/SA/PSA
@soap: if you get above a 175 you should just reapply because you’d probably be competitive for penn nyu and cls at that point with scholly money
I scored 156 on my first LSAT in August, I cancelled that and retook it immediately in September and got 163. Do yall think I can cross into 170's if I start studying from like january to summer
because i've heard that any score increase after 165 is just as hard as from 145 to 160
soap
14:01
I've been told by my parents that I cannot reapply because I have the full ride to UMN and so I better take whatever I can get lol
texaslawhopefully
14:01
I’m going to have to disagree with soap on the point of doing the hardest questions first. I think it’s just a general waste of time to over complicate your strategy. You’re going to have do all the questions anyone. Ignore the clock and focus on one question at a time.
@VolatileClumsyAcolyte: it gets harder to increase your score as you go up, but if you work hard and consistently work on your mistakes it’s entirely possible you break 170
got it thank u guys
@soap: lol oh well just get top 10% a umn and then transfer to harvard because you come from a grade deflated undergrad and law school will be easy for you
soap
14:02
I think the order in which you do questions is a matter of personal preference. In PTs I've always scored better doing the hardest ones first, but that's just because it reduces the stress personally lol
soap
14:02
I guess since I'm paying for all this anyhow I could just wait and reapply lmao
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.