Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

de medietate linguae

Read a random definition: lifting costs

A quick definition of de medietate linguae:

Term: de medietate linguae

Definition: De medietate linguae means "of half-tongue" in Law Latin. It refers to a type of jury that is made up of an equal number of people who are from the country where the trial is taking place and people who are from other countries. This type of jury was originally used in commercial cases when one party was from another country, but it was later used in criminal cases too. If there weren't enough people from other countries to make up the jury, the trial would still go ahead with the people who were available.

A more thorough explanation:

de medietate linguae

de medietate linguae is a term used in law to describe a jury that is made up of an equal number of native and foreign jurors. This type of jury was originally created by King Edward III for commercial cases where one party was a foreigner. Later, it was also used in criminal cases. If there were not enough foreign jurors available, the trial would proceed with the available number.

An example of de medietate linguae would be a trial where half of the jurors are American citizens and the other half are citizens of another country. Another example would be a trial where half of the jurors are fluent in English and the other half are not.

These examples illustrate the definition of de medietate linguae because they show how the jury is made up of an equal number of native and foreign jurors. This type of jury is used to ensure that both sides of the case are represented fairly and that there is no bias towards one side or the other.

demease | de medio

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.