Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

deed of trust

Read a random definition: etiam in articulo mortis

A quick definition of deed of trust:

A deed of trust is a way to borrow money to buy a house. It involves three people: the person lending the money, the person borrowing the money, and a third person who holds onto the house as security. If the person borrowing the money can't pay it back, the third person can take control of the house and sell it to get the money back. This is called a foreclosure. The third person is usually a title company.

A more thorough explanation:

A deed of trust is a legal document used in some states to secure a real estate transaction. It involves three parties: a lender, a borrower, and a trustee. The lender gives the borrower money, and in exchange, the borrower gives the lender one or more promissory notes. As security for the promissory notes, the borrower transfers a real property interest to a third-party trustee. If the borrower defaults on the loan, the trustee may take control of the property to correct the borrower's default.

For example, when a person buys a home with a loan from a bank, the bank becomes the lender, and the borrower is the person buying the home. The trustee is usually a title company. The borrower makes monthly payments to the bank, and if they fail to make payments, the title company can initiate a non-judicial foreclosure as the bank's agent.

Deeds of trust usually include a power-of-sale clause, which allows the trustee to sell the property without first getting a court order. This is called a non-judicial foreclosure.

Overall, a deed of trust is a way to secure a real estate transaction and protect the lender's investment in case the borrower defaults on the loan.

deed in lieu of foreclosure | deemed export license

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.