Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

dei judicium

Read a random definition: action in equity

A quick definition of dei judicium:

Term: dei judicium

Definition: Dei judicium is a Latin term that means "God's judgment." It refers to a type of trial called an ordeal, where a person would undergo a test or challenge to prove their innocence or guilt. This was believed to be a way for God to reveal the truth and determine the outcome of the trial.

Example: In medieval times, a person accused of a crime might be asked to undergo an ordeal such as walking on hot coals or holding a red-hot iron. If they were unharmed, it was believed that God had judged them innocent. If they were injured, it was seen as a sign of guilt.

A more thorough explanation:

Dei Judicium

Dei Judicium is a Latin term that means "God's judgment." It refers to a type of trial called an ordeal, where a person's guilt or innocence is determined by a test that is believed to be controlled by God.

One example of Dei Judicium is the trial by fire. In this ordeal, the accused would have to hold a red-hot iron or walk barefoot over burning coals. If their wounds healed quickly, it was believed that God had intervened and declared them innocent. If they did not heal, they were considered guilty.

Another example is the trial by water. In this ordeal, the accused would be thrown into a body of water. If they floated, it was believed that God had declared them guilty, and they would be punished. If they sank, they were considered innocent, and their punishment would be avoided.

These examples illustrate how Dei Judicium was used in medieval times as a way to determine guilt or innocence. It was believed that God would intervene and reveal the truth through these tests, and the outcome was seen as a divine judgment.

de iis qui ponendi sunt in assisis | de incremento

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.