Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

demurrage

Read a random definition: deviation doctrine

A quick definition of demurrage:

Demurrage is a fee that a charterer (someone who hires a ship) has to pay to the shipowner if they take longer than the agreed time to load or unload cargo. This fee is like a penalty for being late. There are two types of demurrage: contract demurrage, which is agreed upon in the contract between the charterer and shipowner, and non-contract demurrage, which is ordered by a court. Demurrage can also refer to a charge for returning ocean containers or equipment late.

A more thorough explanation:

Demurrage is a term used in maritime law to refer to the liquidated damages that a charterer owes to a shipowner for failing to load or unload cargo within the agreed time. There are two types of demurrage:

This is demurrage that is paid by a charterer if the time to load or unload the vessel at port takes longer than what was agreed upon in the charterer's contract with the shipowner. For example, if a charterer agrees to unload a cargo ship within three days but takes five days to do so, they will have to pay contract demurrage to the shipowner.

This is demurrage that is not provided for in the contract but is ordered by a court. For example, if a charterer fails to unload a cargo ship within the agreed time and the shipowner takes them to court, the court may order the charterer to pay non-contract demurrage as damages for detention.

In addition to the above, demurrage can also refer to a charge that is due for the late return of ocean containers or other equipment.

Overall, demurrage is a way to compensate shipowners for the loss of time and money caused by a charterer's failure to load or unload cargo within the agreed time.

demurrable | demurrant

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
17:29
@LawIsForPeasants: hey.
Vandy gettin fat, that's what bandi did
Dont agree dkk but out of messages so this is a talk for another day
17:34
@LawIsForPeasants: I just want you to know that: you matter, you are important, and finally, I am proud of you. :D
That is so fucking cringe and leave me alone
llama i appreciate you
17:35
@LawIsForPeasants: while charlie kirk's facts do not care about your feelings, just know that I do!
texaslawhopefully
17:36
@Dkk: Fair enough, but if you're using political philosophy to defend Trump, it's hard to reconcile him as a candidate with very relevant classic political theory, like Locke's individual rights and limited government as illustrated in the 2nd treatise, or the constitutional framework limiting executive power (e.g., Federalist 51). Trump's disregard for constitutional checks and populist rhetoric directly is in tension with our very foundational principles.
Dkk
17:36
@SplitterusClitterus: sounds good. Trying to paint a wine glass rn anyway after I just woke up.
Dkk
17:37
@texaslawhopefully: Psssh I would not use gender relations as a way to defend Trump. He does not go that route and I think literally him and everyone in their cabinet has no idea what those are. I mean, just look at how many divorces Elon and Trump have had.
texaslawhopefully
17:38
Was that not why you said you voted for him?
17:38
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: can I ask what “2 years retroactive withdrawals” means
17:39
elon and trump realize there are many fish in the sea, and sometimes u can't just 'make it work'
@sadpadresfan: grades changed to W for two consecutive years of classes
Dkk
17:39
Nah, I did not vote. I have never voted in my life because I have a lot of issues with it. 4 years ago my mom filled out my ballot for me because she wanted to but I do not vote.
17:40
based fellow non voter
@llama i do not need or desire external validation.
17:40
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: ah I see
17:41
@LawIsForPeasants: ok, sorry, I will not bother u while u 'self validate yourself in the corner' my bad.
@llama: im self validating so hard rn
17:42
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: thats very ithica of you, wasp.
texaslawhopefully
17:44
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: Out of curiosity, since you're in law school and prolly know fedsoc people, how conservative do you think you have to be to be in fedsoc? Like is a david french sort of conservative fairly common in it, or is it the maga type people mainly
i dont interact with any fedsoc people, but i dont know any maga people at cornell. but the student body overwhelmingly leans left, so i think they might not be comfortable showing that theyre conservative if that makes sense?
one time a guy kind of crashed out about masks in conlaw
but that's the most ive seen
texaslawhopefully
17:47
Yeah, that does make sense. I would like to join fedsoc, but I'm also, clearly, very opposed to Trump and where the GOP has gone.
if you join fedsoc and go for clerking and eventually become a judge. you will be pinholed into maga politics as long as maga is the predominant conservative stance
Idk if @irishdinosaur is online but congrats on UCLA!!
next you will say you want to be the first black kkk grand wizard
@SaddestPortlander: tysm!!!!
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.