Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

dependent relative revocation

Read a random definition: and his heirs

A quick definition of dependent relative revocation:

Dependent Relative Revocation: A rule that says if someone tries to cancel their will, but they only did it because they thought they had a new, better will, and it turns out they were wrong, then the old will can still be used. This only works if the cancellation was conditional, meaning it was based on a mistaken belief. It doesn't always make the cancelled will valid again, but it can sometimes help.

A more thorough explanation:

Dependent relative revocation is a legal principle that can undo a revocation of a will if there is evidence that the testator's revocation was conditional rather than absolute. This means that if a testator revokes their will, but it was based on a mistaken belief or condition, the revocation may be undone.

For example, if a testator revokes their will because they believe a new will is valid, but the new will is actually invalid, the dependent relative revocation doctrine may apply. This would undo the revocation and reinstate the original will.

It's important to note that this doctrine only applies to the revocation itself and does not necessarily validate an otherwise invalid will or accomplish the testator's intent.

dependent promise | dependent state

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
Dkk
19:42
SEO is big money
2016 pushed the conservative party into populism irreversibly
Dkk
19:43
Maybe, but if this is populism, then every election is populist.
19:43
@Dkk: yeah register 1 website and every swinging tom dick and harry calls/emails/texts to 'help with seo'. like bruh, if YOU found it, what i am doing is working
Dkk
19:43
Indeed!
19:48
wasp, i think people are hopeful for a gov who at least attempts to care about the common man
MIAMI A
[] AromaticTroubledDormouse
20:55
How does one know if they are UR1 or UR2?
[] AromaticTroubledDormouse
20:56
CONGRATS MACAQUE!
TY
got a random stanford email and almost had a heart attack
ALSO CONGRATS!
Congrats1!
21:15
Miami A, yall I'm so excited I could cry.
21:15
Feel like I can finally stop holding my breath!! Whew!!!
[] baddestbunny
22:16
every time I get accosted by a strange man who follows me around because my male coworkers were too busy talking to walk me back to my car I get closer to saying we need to bring back traditional gender roles
Dkk
22:32
Nice! @Macaque
Dkk
22:32
@Aromatic, Have to guess.
Dkk
22:33
That sucks @Bunny do you have to go to the hospital?
[] baddestbunny
22:40
I said accosted not assaulted
23:35
guys. my notre dame address just went long is this good or bad
1a2b3c4d26z
23:37
Oooooo me too
23:37
omg is this good or bad
Dkk
23:47
Idk if gender roles are gunna fix that then.
23:49
it looks like most people who applied in october last cycle didn't get a decision until january... does it even mean anything that our addresses went long??
hows ED 2 compared to ED 1?
Dkk
0:10
No idea
windyMagician
0:34
reporting live to say my ndls address also went long
does it mean anything ^
Dkk
2:21
NDLS and Fordham took a very long time last year. It's good info for people to know.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.