Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

disclaimer trust

Read a random definition: policy of insurance

A quick definition of disclaimer trust:

A disclaimer trust is a special type of trust that helps spouses reduce the amount of taxes they have to pay on their estate. When one spouse dies, the other can choose to inherit their assets directly or disclaim them. If they disclaim the assets, they go into an irrevocable trust that avoids estate taxes for the surviving spouse. The surviving spouse still gets to use the assets, but they have to follow the rules of the trust. This type of trust can also protect assets from creditors and ensure that children receive them after the surviving spouse passes away.

A more thorough explanation:

A disclaimer trust is a type of trust that helps spouses limit estate taxes. When one spouse dies, the other spouse can choose to inherit assets directly or disclaim them. If the surviving spouse disclaims the assets, they will be moved into an irrevocable trust, known as a disclaimer trust, which avoids estate taxes for the surviving spouse. The surviving spouse can still benefit from the assets, but they will be limited to the terms of the trust.

For example, let's say John and Jane are married. John has assets worth $5 million, and he wants to ensure that Jane doesn't have to pay estate taxes on those assets when he dies. John can create a disclaimer trust in his will, which states that if Jane disclaims the assets, they will be moved into the trust. If Jane disclaims the assets, they will be moved into the trust, and she can still benefit from them, but she will be limited to the terms of the trust.

A disclaimer trust can also be used to keep assets away from creditors, later spouses if the surviving spouse gets remarried, or to ensure that children receive the assets from the trust after the surviving spouse passes.

For example, let's say John and Jane have children from previous marriages. John wants to ensure that his children receive his assets when he dies, but he also wants to provide for Jane. John can create a disclaimer trust in his will, which states that if Jane disclaims the assets, they will be moved into the trust, and his children will receive them after Jane passes away.

disclaimer | disclosure

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
@ClockworkBlue: I feel like most people could train for the 40 for the same amount of time as they do the LSAT and get close to sub 5 which would be equivalent to a 167+
this is like the schizophrenic posts JJK tik tok be putting out
powerscaling Law School deans up next
11:19
Election Day election day
Write in Dean Z vote
11:20
Saw a guy that wrote in Biden and he said no retirement for you buddy
1a2b3c4d26z
11:20
@ClockworkBlue: god I hope that's true
if the country was run the same as Mich Law it would be a better place
Imagine if election night was run by an adcom? Like, "yep, we could get the results Friday, or June 2025."
imagine if it was like Berkley applications
1a2b3c4d26z
11:22
Election status: Complete
1a2b3c4d26z
11:22
For months
triplethread
11:23
erection day
soapy
11:23
Shoutout to Robinhood's election bet not resolving until January
triplethread
11:23
is anyone else like certain that trump will win
ambitiouslizard
11:23
he aint winning
triplethread
11:23
i like being a pessimist
ambitiouslizard
11:24
he lost his re-election, why would he win this one?
1a2b3c4d26z
11:25
I have no idea why people have so much beef w berkeley's app
I've been reading a bit about "herding," which is this idea that pollsters are making the race look tied so they look right no matter who wins.
1a2b3c4d26z
11:26
Like... it's a more involved app but you don't have to do it? They're clearly trying to have some self-selection go on
I 100% agree with the self selection, I also am not even close to touching the medians there. However I think the huge PS plus the video and especially the very specific criteria for the why Berkeley essay is pretty crazy
I'm curious, how bold can one be in those videos? Is it worth making a satirical Jason Statham-action short if the adcoms have no sense of humor?
the more risk you take the higher chance of it backfiring
my instinct would be low humor bc if they have such a complex application I would feel hesitant to use a major part of it as a joke. They clearly take their admissions seriously and a joke video might convey the wrong thing at the wrong time. I think that humor is best put into a PS anecdote where it adds some shine to your personality
safe is always better
All good points
triplethread
11:34
@TheAdoptedOne: amazing
I almost did one for Vanderbilt and my idea was to do a documentary-style vid where I and others talked about me like it was an ESPN 30 for 30.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.