Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

doctrine of coercion

Read a random definition: colloquium

A quick definition of doctrine of coercion:

The doctrine of coercion refers to the use of physical force or threats to compel someone to do something against their will. This can include criminal acts, accusations, or the withholding of official action. It can also refer to the improper use of economic power to force someone to submit to the wishes of another. Historically, the doctrine of coercion was used to describe a husband's control over his wife's actions, but this has been abolished. Coercion is not legal and can invalidate actions such as signing a will or entering into a marriage.

A more thorough explanation:

The doctrine of coercion refers to the use of physical force or the threat of physical force to compel someone to do something against their will. It can also refer to the improper use of economic power to force someone to submit to the wishes of the person who wields it.

  • Signing a will under threat of physical harm is not legally valid.
  • A marriage that was entered into under duress or coercion can be invalidated.
  • Criminal coercion involves threatening to commit a crime against someone, accusing them of a crime, exposing a secret that would harm their reputation, or taking or withholding official action.

These examples illustrate how coercion can be used to manipulate or control someone's actions, often against their will. It is important to recognize and prevent coercion in order to protect individuals from harm and ensure that their rights are respected.

doctrine of claim differentiation | doctrine of contagion

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
RoaldDahl
16:10
@HopefullyInLawSchool: what if i already got rejected. does it mean anything
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.