Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

doctrine of superior equities

Read a random definition: bootstrap sale

A quick definition of doctrine of superior equities:

The doctrine of superior equities is a rule in insurance that says an insurance company cannot recover money from someone whose rights are equal or better than the insurance company's. This means that the insurance company can only use subrogation (the right to take legal action against someone who caused the loss) if the guilty party's rights are worse than the insured person's. It's also called the "risk-stops-here" rule.

A more thorough explanation:

The doctrine of superior equities is a rule in insurance that prevents an insurer from recovering from anyone whose equities are equal or superior to the insurer's. This means that the insurer cannot seek reimbursement from someone who has an equal or greater right to the funds in question.

For example, if an insured person is injured in a car accident caused by another driver, and the insured person's insurance company pays for their medical expenses, the insurance company may seek reimbursement from the at-fault driver's insurance company. However, if the at-fault driver's insurance company can prove that their insured person also suffered injuries in the accident and has a right to the funds, the doctrine of superior equities would prevent the first insurance company from seeking reimbursement.

The doctrine of superior equities is also known as the "risk-stops-here" rule, as it places the burden of risk on the insurer rather than the insured.

doctrine of substituted judgment | doctrine of tenures

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
14:30
Sent an app to OSU in early december and have STILL not heard back
Give it 4 more weeks at least. Everyone in this chat needs to wait longer.
TrumpSucks
19:58
@steelrift99: Same for me at Arizona
TrumpSucks
20:00
It is frustrating when people are admitted who applied after you. But that’s just part of the game I guess
was friday a umich R wave?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.