Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

doctrine of superior equities

Read a random definition: Simplified Network Application Process Redesign (SNAP-R)

A quick definition of doctrine of superior equities:

The doctrine of superior equities is a rule in insurance that says an insurance company cannot recover money from someone whose rights are equal or better than the insurance company's. This means that the insurance company can only use subrogation (the right to take legal action against someone who caused the loss) if the guilty party's rights are worse than the insured person's. It's also called the "risk-stops-here" rule.

A more thorough explanation:

The doctrine of superior equities is a rule in insurance that prevents an insurer from recovering from anyone whose equities are equal or superior to the insurer's. This means that the insurer cannot seek reimbursement from someone who has an equal or greater right to the funds in question.

For example, if an insured person is injured in a car accident caused by another driver, and the insured person's insurance company pays for their medical expenses, the insurance company may seek reimbursement from the at-fault driver's insurance company. However, if the at-fault driver's insurance company can prove that their insured person also suffered injuries in the accident and has a right to the funds, the doctrine of superior equities would prevent the first insurance company from seeking reimbursement.

The doctrine of superior equities is also known as the "risk-stops-here" rule, as it places the burden of risk on the insurer rather than the insured.

doctrine of substituted judgment | doctrine of tenures

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
18:46
do u have a dream school?
18:46
well i saw one is at fordham and one is at upenn and ik fordham isnt t14 but its better than temple and villanova
18:47
dream is duke
18:47
ooh interesting choice why Duke?
18:48
i got into fordham and so did the dumbass I was dating for like two months it’s not that hard
18:48
by which I mean if they let him in I don’t trust their standards
18:49
my dad went to duke law so i have been a fan forever
18:49
Duke is fun. I took a trip there when I was 19 or so. Really good time when I was a young rapscallion.
18:49
and ik i just dont think i gave myself enough time for a guaranteed 170+ performance
18:49
I didnt see if anyone answered my UGA question. Did anyone answer it?
18:53
@Dkkm11: are you not still a young rapscallion?
19:00
Nah, I am gray-bearded wizard.
19:02
Hmmm. I guess that’s okay.
19:03
Honestly, idk what I would call myself these days. Will probably not know until I can reflect on this part of my life which will be idk, in like 5 years when I am 32.
19:06
Does your life come in 5 year epochs typically?
19:06
Someone told me a while ago that I was probably molested as a kid because I don’t really have any clear memories of my childhood. But I don’t think I was.
1a2b3c4d26z
19:10
Inside thoughts!
19:10
this is where I post my inside thoughts
19:11
Nah, the fucked up thing about therapists is they try and make you think your parents are your enemy 99% of the time and really they should be telling you that your parents have almost no effect on the rest of your life. If they can get you to keep focusing on your parents they can keep making money.
19:12
Yeah, my life really does flow in about 5 years periods.
19:12
My crypto also flows in 5 day epochs too.
19:16
what do you do with your days as an unemployed crypto guy? do you play an instrument or something
19:47
please lawd
19:47
forgive me
19:47
its time to go back to tha old me
19:50
this is what i feel like when i get one single drill question right
19:50
when u get one wrong ;(
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.