The young man knows the rules, but the old man knows the exceptions.

✨ Enjoy an ad-free experience with LSD+

Legal Definitions - dual-persona doctrine

LSDefine

Definition of dual-persona doctrine

The dual-persona doctrine is a legal principle that allows an employee to sue their employer for certain injuries, even when workers' compensation laws would normally prevent such a lawsuit. This exception applies when the employer was acting in a distinct "second persona" or role, entirely separate from their usual status as an employer, and that separate role caused the injury.

Typically, workers' compensation laws provide the exclusive remedy for employees injured on the job, meaning they cannot sue their employer directly for negligence. However, the dual-persona doctrine recognizes that an employer might have duties to an employee that arise from a relationship other than just employment. If an injury stems from a breach of these separate duties, the employer may be held liable in that distinct capacity.

Here are some examples to illustrate the dual-persona doctrine:

  • Example 1: Employer as a Property Owner

    A manufacturing company owns the building where its factory operates. An employee, while working, slips and falls on a poorly maintained staircase that leads to a common area, sustaining an injury. The staircase's disrepair is a general hazard that would affect any tenant or visitor, not specifically related to the employee's manufacturing duties.

    Explanation: In this scenario, the company acts in two capacities: as an employer providing a workplace, and as a property owner responsible for maintaining a safe premises for all occupants. If the injury resulted from a failure in its duties as a property owner (e.g., neglecting building maintenance), rather than a hazard specific to the manufacturing process, the employee might be able to sue the company under its "property owner" persona, distinct from its "employer" persona.

  • Example 2: Employer as a Manufacturer of Equipment

    A company that designs and builds specialized industrial ovens also uses these ovens in its own production facility. An employee operating one of these ovens is severely burned due to a hidden design flaw in the oven's safety mechanism, a flaw that would make the company liable to any customer who purchased the oven.

    Explanation: Here, the company has a "manufacturer" persona (designing and producing equipment) and an "employer" persona (providing tools for its employees). If the injury is caused by a defect in the product itself, a defect that would expose the company to product liability claims from any user, the employee might be able to sue the company in its capacity as a manufacturer, separate from its role as an employer.

  • Example 3: Employer as a Service Provider

    A large hospital employs a physician. While off-duty and visiting the hospital as a patient for a personal medical issue, the physician receives negligent treatment from another hospital staff member, leading to a new injury or worsening of their condition.

    Explanation: The hospital acts as an employer to the physician, but it also acts as a healthcare provider to patients. When the physician is receiving treatment as a patient, the hospital's primary duty to them is that of a medical service provider, not solely an employer. If the injury arises from medical malpractice, the physician might be able to sue the hospital under its "healthcare provider" persona, distinct from its "employer" persona.

Simple Definition

The dual-persona doctrine is a legal principle allowing an employee to sue their employer in tort, even if workers' compensation laws typically provide immunity. This exception applies when the employer's liability stems from a distinct "second persona" that is entirely separate from their usual role as an employer.

A judge is a law student who marks his own examination papers.

✨ Enjoy an ad-free experience with LSD+