Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Duren test

Read a random definition: nonexclusive license

A quick definition of Duren test:

The Duren test is a way to check if a jury is made up of a fair and impartial group of people. It is important because everyone has the right to a fair trial. The test looks at whether a certain group of people is not represented enough in the jury pool compared to how many of them live in the community. If this is the case, and the group is being left out on purpose, then it is not fair. The government must have a good reason for this difference, or it is against the law.

A more thorough explanation:

The Duren test is a legal test used to determine if a jury's composition violates a criminal defendant's Sixth Amendment right to an impartial jury and the fair-cross-section requirement.

The test has three parts:

  1. A distinctive group is not fairly and reasonably represented in the jury pool in relation to its population in the community.
  2. The underrepresentation is the result of a systematic exclusion of the group from the jury-selection process.
  3. The government cannot reasonably justify the discrepancy.

An example of the Duren test in action would be if a criminal defendant argued that the jury pool did not include enough people from their racial or ethnic group. If the defendant could prove that their group was underrepresented in the pool and that this was due to a systematic exclusion, then the court would use the Duren test to determine if there was a constitutional violation.

Duration Directive | duressor

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.