Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Durrett rule

Read a random definition: holder in good faith

A quick definition of Durrett rule:

Durrett Rule: A rule in bankruptcy that says if someone sells something for less than 70% of its value, it might not be allowed. This rule is often used for foreclosure sales. However, the U.S. Supreme Court has said that for mortgage foreclosure sales, the price received at a regular sale is fair and reasonable.

A more thorough explanation:

The Durrett Rule is a principle in bankruptcy law that states that a transfer of property in exchange for less than 70% of its value should be considered a preferential transfer and invalidated. This rule was established in the case of Durrett v. Washington Nat'l Ins. Co. in 1980 and is now codified in 11 USCA § 548.

For example, if a debtor sells a piece of property worth $100,000 to a friend for only $50,000 shortly before filing for bankruptcy, this transfer may be considered a preferential transfer under the Durrett Rule and could be invalidated by the bankruptcy court.

However, the Durrett Rule has been largely overruled by the U.S. Supreme Court, at least in the context of mortgage foreclosure sales. The Court has held that the price received at a regularly conducted, noncollusive sale represents a reasonably equivalent value of the property, even if it is less than the property's fair market value. This means that foreclosure sales are generally not subject to the Durrett Rule.

Durham rule | Dutch auction

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 1 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.