Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

e.g.,

Read a random definition: public policy

A quick definition of e.g.,:

Term: e.g.

Definition: E.g. is short for "for example." It's used to show one or more examples that support what you're saying. In legal writing, it means that the source you're using is just one of many that support your argument. You should always put a comma after e.g. In regular writing, you can use e.g. to give examples that help explain what you're talking about. For example, if you're selling winter clothes, you might say "Winter clothes on sale (e.g., coats, gloves, hats)." This means that you're selling more than just those three things, but they're good examples of what you have.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: E.g. is short for exempli gratia, which is a Latin phrase that means "for example." It is used to introduce one or more examples that support a statement or argument.

In formal legal writing, e.g. is a signal that indicates the following source is one example out of many that could be given. It is used to show that the source supports the argument being made.

For example:

  • Winter clothes on sale (e.g., coats, gloves, hats). Get them while they last!
  • There are many types of fruit (e.g., apples, bananas, oranges).

These examples illustrate how e.g. is used to introduce examples that support a statement. In the first example, e.g. is used to show that coats, gloves, and hats are examples of winter clothes that are on sale. In the second example, e.g. is used to show that apples, bananas, and oranges are examples of different types of fruit.

It's important to note that e.g. should be followed by a comma and can be preceded by other signals, such as "see" or "but see." In general writing, e.g. can be used to give examples that clarify or support a statement.

dynasty trust | EA

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
11ama
20:08
Indeed.
damn how are you guys calculating all these numbers lmao
i'm guessing maybe around 30ish more As then?
if we're being generous
11ama
20:27
@HeadyInvincibleRabbit: Mostly using https://www.lsd.law/download and the 509 repots
11ama
20:28
reeeeeeports*
fml i'm a november applicant that still hasn't heard back
do we know if there are date changes for Rs too? for umich
how come i haven’t heard from some schools w high acceptance rates? what are they up to? like nebraska hasn’t been releasing decisions
is washu done sending out decisions? they just completely ghosted me
11ama
20:33
@SuperficialBlueWeasel: The reality is you are likely behind a gaggle of Sept-Oct. applicants. THe schools are backed up with apps. Some are fast, others are really slow. Also some schools may have had adcoms retire/ shortage of cannonfadder app readers. Try to chill out/research the schools you have applied to so when you get an answer you can move quick and lock up a deal/
thanks @11ama
11ama
20:34
In the event you have not received an admissions decision yet, have you tried turning your computer on and off, have you tried checking your span, and have you ensured your email inbox is not full?
OlDirtyBtard
20:34
I used to come on here and troll people and now I got my first R's and I no longer have a sense of humor
11ama
20:36
I was interested in applying to 'Bama law. Called them up, asked if they had any distant cousins attending their institution based on family name/ Ancestry.con DNA. They did not. I replied I was regrettably no longer interested in their institution.
Are you sure you ever did
OlDirtyBtard
20:36
all i'm saying is, i would debase myself to dean cooper for a cornell A
11ama
20:37
@OlDirtyBtard: Being an asshole is not sufficient for being funny, Unc.
11ama
20:37
Trust me, I tried it many a times b4/
20:39
I wonder if schools are punishing R&R's with no increases to GPA or LSAT.
20:40
Or no new work experience.
20:40
Last cycle people who are too burnt to go get something impressive to add to their resume and application.
11ama
21:00
@JuicyApple: Oh no doubt. Wouldn't you be perturbed if you rejected someone and they came back next year with a 'hey boo, its me again' ?
fedclerkhopeful
21:02
Yeah that’s def a real fear. I think too it puts people who have high stats but are going to reapply in a weird place because you can’t even improve the most important parts of your app
11ama
21:03
I'm sure it falls in the same category as retaking the LSAT: one more thing to be held against you.
21:05
Alrighty then. Sounds bad.
OlDirtyBtard
21:06
nah tbh just reapp to make them say no
OlDirtyBtard
21:06
advance out of spite alone
11ama
21:17
Pretty crazy sheer number of applicants, IMO. I hope people find fulfilling work, yet I fear the future will not reveal said state of affairs since movies/culture makes law seem much more bad ass than it is.
11ama
21:18
Law = paper pusher maxxing, prove me wrong;
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.