If the law is on your side, pound the law. If the facts are on your side, pound the facts. If neither the law nor the facts are on your side, pound the table.

✨ Enjoy an ad-free experience with LSD+

Legal Definitions - economic duress

LSDefine

Definition of economic duress

Economic duress refers to a situation in contract law where one party uses improper or unlawful financial pressure to force another party into an agreement they would not otherwise accept. Essentially, it means that one party exploits the other's vulnerable financial position, threatening significant economic harm, to coerce them into new or modified contractual terms. The pressured party feels they have no reasonable alternative but to agree, thus undermining their free will in forming the contract.

For economic duress to be a valid defense against a contract, it typically involves:

  • An existing contractual relationship between the parties.
  • One party threatening to breach or terminate that existing contract.
  • The threat causing the other party to fear substantial financial loss or hardship.
  • The pressured party having no practical choice but to accept the new, unfavorable terms.

If successfully proven, economic duress can make a contract voidable, meaning the pressured party can choose to cancel it, as it was not entered into with genuine consent.

Examples of Economic Duress:

  • Example 1: Construction Project Delay

    A small plumbing subcontractor, "AquaFlow Inc.," is nearing completion on a large commercial building project for a general contractor, "MegaBuild Corp." AquaFlow Inc. has already invested heavily in materials and labor, and a significant portion of their payment is due upon final inspection. Just days before the deadline, MegaBuild Corp. unexpectedly informs AquaFlow Inc. that they will only pay 70% of the agreed-upon amount unless AquaFlow Inc. signs a new agreement accepting the reduced payment. MegaBuild Corp. knows that AquaFlow Inc. is facing tight cash flow, has other projects lined up that depend on this payment, and would suffer severe financial distress, potentially bankruptcy, if the full payment is withheld or significantly delayed. Feeling they have no other immediate option to avoid financial ruin, AquaFlow Inc. reluctantly signs the new agreement.

    This illustrates economic duress because MegaBuild Corp. leveraged AquaFlow Inc.'s financial vulnerability and the threat of withholding a crucial payment from an existing contract to force them into a new, unfavorable agreement, leaving AquaFlow Inc. with no practical alternative.

  • Example 2: Essential Software Service

    A small online retail business, "TrendyThreads," relies entirely on a specific inventory management software provided by "DataFlow Solutions" under an annual service contract. One month before a major holiday shopping season, DataFlow Solutions suddenly informs TrendyThreads that they will immediately cease all technical support and data hosting services unless TrendyThreads agrees to a new contract with a 300% price increase and a mandatory five-year commitment. DataFlow Solutions is aware that TrendyThreads has no immediate alternative software provider that can integrate with their existing systems in such a short timeframe, and losing access to their inventory data during the holiday season would lead to catastrophic financial losses and potential business failure.

    This demonstrates economic duress because DataFlow Solutions exploited TrendyThreads' critical dependence on an essential service and the threat of immediate cessation of that service to coerce them into accepting drastically unfavorable new terms, leaving TrendyThreads with no reasonable choice but to comply to avoid immense financial harm.

Simple Definition

Economic duress occurs when one party uses improper threats of financial harm to coerce another into a contract, preventing them from entering the agreement with free will. This unlawful pressure, often involving a threat to an existing contract, can be used as a defense to argue that a binding contract was not validly formed.

The end of law is not to abolish or restrain, but to preserve and enlarge freedom.

✨ Enjoy an ad-free experience with LSD+