Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

election, estoppel by

Read a random definition: International Parental Kidnapping Crime Act of 1993

A quick definition of election, estoppel by:

Election, estoppel by is a legal term that refers to a situation where a person intentionally chooses one option over another, and as a result, is prevented from benefiting from the option not chosen. Estoppel, in general, is a legal principle that prevents a person from denying or contradicting something they have previously said or done. Estoppel can arise from various situations, such as a false representation, a failure to speak when under a duty to do so, or a delay in asserting a claim.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Estoppel by election is a legal principle that prevents a person from benefiting from one option while rejecting another option that is inconsistent with the first option. It arises when a person intentionally chooses one option over another and is then prevented from claiming the benefits of the option they rejected.

Example: A person inherits a property that is subject to a mortgage. The person has the option to either assume the mortgage or pay it off. If the person chooses to assume the mortgage, they cannot later claim that they did not agree to be responsible for the mortgage payments. This is because they made an intentional choice to assume the mortgage and are now estopped from denying their responsibility.

This example illustrates how estoppel by election works. Once a person makes a choice, they are bound by that choice and cannot later claim the benefits of a different option that is inconsistent with their original choice.

election, doctrine of | election board

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.