LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

election, estoppel by

Read a random definition: irreconcilable differences

A quick definition of election, estoppel by:

Election, estoppel by is a legal term that refers to a situation where a person intentionally chooses one option over another, and as a result, is prevented from benefiting from the option not chosen. Estoppel, in general, is a legal principle that prevents a person from denying or contradicting something they have previously said or done. Estoppel can arise from various situations, such as a false representation, a failure to speak when under a duty to do so, or a delay in asserting a claim.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Estoppel by election is a legal principle that prevents a person from benefiting from one option while rejecting another option that is inconsistent with the first option. It arises when a person intentionally chooses one option over another and is then prevented from claiming the benefits of the option they rejected.

Example: A person inherits a property that is subject to a mortgage. The person has the option to either assume the mortgage or pay it off. If the person chooses to assume the mortgage, they cannot later claim that they did not agree to be responsible for the mortgage payments. This is because they made an intentional choice to assume the mortgage and are now estopped from denying their responsibility.

This example illustrates how estoppel by election works. Once a person makes a choice, they are bound by that choice and cannot later claim the benefits of a different option that is inconsistent with their original choice.

election, doctrine of | election board

General

General chat about the legal profession.

General >T14 Off Topic

👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎

ClockworkBlue

11:21

Imagine if election night was run by an adcom? Like, "yep, we could get the results Friday, or June 2025."

TheAdoptedOne

11:21

imagine if it was like Berkley applications

1a2b3c4d26z

11:22

Election status: Complete

1a2b3c4d26z

11:22

For months

triplethread

11:23

erection day

TheAdoptedOne

11:23

https://www.reddit.com/r/lawschooladmissions/comments/1gixhib/berkeleys_application_is_snobby_af/

soapy

11:23

Shoutout to Robinhood's election bet not resolving until January

triplethread

11:23

is anyone else like certain that trump will win

ambitiouslizard

11:23

he aint winning

triplethread

11:23

i like being a pessimist

ambitiouslizard

11:24

he lost his re-election, why would he win this one?

1a2b3c4d26z

11:25

I have no idea why people have so much beef w berkeley's app

ClockworkBlue

11:25

I've been reading a bit about "herding," which is this idea that pollsters are making the race look tied so they look right no matter who wins.

1a2b3c4d26z

11:26

Like... it's a more involved app but you don't have to do it? They're clearly trying to have some self-selection go on

TheAdoptedOne

11:28

I 100% agree with the self selection, I also am not even close to touching the medians there. However I think the huge PS plus the video and especially the very specific criteria for the why Berkeley essay is pretty crazy

ClockworkBlue

11:31

I'm curious, how bold can one be in those videos? Is it worth making a satirical Jason Statham-action short if the adcoms have no sense of humor?

KnowledgeableRitzyWasp

11:33

the more risk you take the higher chance of it backfiring

TheAdoptedOne

11:33

my instinct would be low humor bc if they have such a complex application I would feel hesitant to use a major part of it as a joke. They clearly take their admissions seriously and a joke video might convey the wrong thing at the wrong time. I think that humor is best put into a PS anecdote where it adds some shine to your personality

KnowledgeableRitzyWasp

11:33

safe is always better

ClockworkBlue

11:34

All good points

triplethread

11:34

@TheAdoptedOne: amazing

ClockworkBlue

11:35

I almost did one for Vanderbilt and my idea was to do a documentary-style vid where I and others talked about me like it was an ESPN 30 for 30.

1a2b3c4d26z

11:36

I was risky in maybe one or two of my essays in that some parts read as slightly humorous, but I really tried to suss out the vibe for each school. I feel like Berk and UMich may be more accommodating of a more "out there" approach than other schools I applied to

1a2b3c4d26z

11:37

but that's literally just going off vibes

TheAdoptedOne

11:37

it looks like Berk vid is in response to a known prompt. My thinking is it may be a counter to AI by getting people to have to respond to what is essentially an essay prompt but on video

TheAdoptedOne

11:38

"I think really it’s more the USNWR change that emphasizes employment outcomes in school rankings. Schools want to admit people who have the skills to be more likely to land great jobs even more than before, and being a good interviewer is a very important for that. They want to see you have the soft skills." from a reddit comment

1a2b3c4d26z

11:38

One funny thing when talking to lawyers at work is that they will always say how they wish more law schools had interviews to make sure you can like... talk to people and form sentences

TheAdoptedOne

11:41

getting lunch no one say anything funny or do anything cool for 15 mins

triplethread

11:43

my dick fell off

ClockworkBlue

11:43

Trump dropped out of the race

LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.