Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

emblements

Read a random definition: Federalist Papers

A quick definition of emblements:

Emblements are crops that are grown every year through hard work, like corn, wheat, and vegetables. They are different from trees, grass, and naturally growing fruit. Emblements are like personal property, and the person who grew them has the right to harvest them. If the person who grew them dies before the harvest, their family can still harvest them. This is to make sure that the person who worked hard to grow the crops is compensated. However, if the person did something wrong, they might not be able to harvest the crops.

A more thorough explanation:

Emblements are crops that are produced annually through labor, such as corn, wheat, rye, potatoes, and garden vegetables. These crops are considered personal property and belong to the tenant who cultivated the land. However, trees, grass, and naturally growing fruit are not considered emblements.

If a tenant dies before the harvest, the right to harvest the crops will pass to their heirs, even if the heirs have not been physically occupying the land. This is because the doctrine of emblements aims to compensate the tenant for their labor. However, if the tenancy ends due to the tenant's wrongful act or default, the doctrine of emblements does not apply.

For example, if a farmer rents a piece of land and plants corn, the corn is considered an emblement. If the farmer dies before the harvest, their heirs have the right to harvest the corn. However, if the farmer is evicted from the land due to not paying rent, the doctrine of emblements does not apply, and the landlord has the right to the corn.

embezzler | emergency

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
21:14
Don't loose hope frens. It aint over, till its over, brother. -Hoya Saxa
Hey if I am on a bunch of waitlists am I screwed ?
21:39
@AlejandroAI405: Not for certain. You can get off the wait list, however it can be difficult. Would you consider reapplying next year or/and retaking the LSAT? You may drastically increase your choices/outcome(s)/and possibly get a scholarship
stay strong soldiers
10:09
What is up saturday morning gunners
10:09
@llama: RandR is a fucking joke, dont do it alejandro AI lmfao
noreaster
11:06
I genuinely do think being a reapplicant has some influence on a school’s perception of you, like we didn’t want this person before so why would we want them now? If you apply to only a couple schools your first cycle and then reapply with a higher LSAT and apply more broadly you will prob have good odds at the schools you didn’t apply to before
11:24
LMFAO why wait a year to go form UGA to chicago? You make the same biglaw salary lmfao you can get the same elite pi if you finish high, which you should if you are capable of getting chicago with a r and r. This means you advocate them not earning what they could over 4 years - 90k and study then 3 years of law or 3 years of law and then 260k salary? lmfao r and r only makes sense for FC
11:25
If someone applied with a 155 and can get a 170, a lot diff than a 168 hoping for a 172 and wasting a whole year for that
11:25
Oh i know i know i know
11:26
BUt if you want 171 r and r to get a 176+ for top FC at the top schools? okay. Everything else? Take your t25.
11:26
Scholarship dollars? Tuition + 90k income is the same or slightly less than the big law salary, but without a year of career progression.
11:27
It is not a smart move to r and r, long story short, despite what people who want you to pay for essay review and lsat tutor and lsat tutor service say
noreaster
11:58
The other point I would make is that with medians rising your 3.92 GPA might be above median at your dream school one year and below the next
13:20
Both of you make valid points, but if you do not get off the W/L your only options are to R&R or just not pursue. So yea if it makes sense and you can go this year, it may be better than R&R in hopes of better prospects next yr. the devil you know is better than the angel you don't where devil is this cycle and angel is next cycel
i don't think reapplying is going to hurt you from a previously WL/denied school
just make sure you're coming with new things on your resume. maybe a higher lsat or some work experience. a school may not of wanted you this cycle, but if you come back with stronger stats, you're gonna be what they might be looking for.
overall, i'd say work on boosting your lsat though!!
14:18
These decision times are so long, its crazy how I have to put in a deposit without knowing a couple of decisions
14:19
"rolling admissions" will haunt me forever
noreaster
11:05
good way of showing fluctuations over time
MrThickRopes
11:11
Easter waves TD?
Real
checking anyways
17:54
@MrThickRopes: not likely
MrThickRopes
19:01
You was right
Jacobdoeshisbest
19:17
Anyone here go to ookla for undergrad?
MrThickRopes
21:01
Type shit type shit
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.