Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

endorsement

Read a random definition: partes beneficii

A quick definition of endorsement:

An endorsement is when someone writes their name on the back of a paper to show that they agree with it or that they are giving it to someone else. It's like giving someone else your spot in line. This is often done on checks or important documents to show that they are real and can be trusted.

A more thorough explanation:

An endorsement is when someone writes their name on the back of a document to show that they approve of it or to transfer ownership to someone else. This can be done on things like checks, contracts, or receipts to show that the person who wrote their name on it has received it and believes it to be valid.

One example of an endorsement is when someone writes their name on the back of a check to transfer ownership to someone else. For instance, if John receives a check from his employer but wants to give the money to his friend, he can endorse the check by signing his name on the back and writing "Pay to the order of [friend's name]." This gives his friend the right to deposit or cash the check.

Another example is when someone signs a contract to show that they agree to the terms. For example, if Sarah is buying a car from a dealership, she will need to sign a contract that outlines the price, payment terms, and other details. Her signature on the contract is an endorsement that shows she agrees to the terms and is willing to pay for the car.

These examples illustrate how endorsements are used to show approval or transfer ownership of a document. By signing their name, the endorser is indicating that they have received the document and believe it to be valid.

endorse | endorsement (indorsement)

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.