Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

equitable defense

Read a random definition: droit écrit

A quick definition of equitable defense:

An equitable defense is a reason given by a defendant in court to show that the plaintiff's case is not valid. It can be an affirmative defense, which means the defendant presents facts that would defeat the plaintiff's claim, or a real defense, which is a defense that is good against any possible claimant. Examples of equitable defenses include mistake, fraud, illegality, and unclean hands. The defendant's method and strategy in opposing the plaintiff or prosecution is also referred to as the defense.

A more thorough explanation:

An equitable defense is a reason given by a defendant as to why the plaintiff's case is not valid. It is a type of defense that was previously only available in a court of equity but can now be used in a court of law. Examples of equitable defenses include mistake, fraud, illegality, failure of consideration, forum non conveniens, laches, estoppel, and unclean hands.

For instance, if a plaintiff sues a defendant for breach of contract, the defendant may use an equitable defense of fraud, claiming that the plaintiff misled them into signing the contract. Another example is if a plaintiff sues a defendant for patent infringement, the defendant may use an equitable defense of unclean hands, arguing that the plaintiff breached the duty of candor and good faith during the patent prosecution.

Equitable defenses are used to prevent the plaintiff from recovering what they seek in their complaint or petition. They are important in ensuring that the legal system is fair and just for all parties involved.

equitable conversion | equitable disseisin

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
11ama
19:41
@dubiously: Ikik, I was just trying to make a joke
19:51
We will see, we will see!
11ama
20:08
Indeed.
damn how are you guys calculating all these numbers lmao
i'm guessing maybe around 30ish more As then?
if we're being generous
11ama
20:27
@HeadyInvincibleRabbit: Mostly using https://www.lsd.law/download and the 509 repots
11ama
20:28
reeeeeeports*
fml i'm a november applicant that still hasn't heard back
do we know if there are date changes for Rs too? for umich
how come i haven’t heard from some schools w high acceptance rates? what are they up to? like nebraska hasn’t been releasing decisions
is washu done sending out decisions? they just completely ghosted me
11ama
20:33
@SuperficialBlueWeasel: The reality is you are likely behind a gaggle of Sept-Oct. applicants. THe schools are backed up with apps. Some are fast, others are really slow. Also some schools may have had adcoms retire/ shortage of cannonfadder app readers. Try to chill out/research the schools you have applied to so when you get an answer you can move quick and lock up a deal/
thanks @11ama
11ama
20:34
In the event you have not received an admissions decision yet, have you tried turning your computer on and off, have you tried checking your span, and have you ensured your email inbox is not full?
OlDirtyBtard
20:34
I used to come on here and troll people and now I got my first R's and I no longer have a sense of humor
11ama
20:36
I was interested in applying to 'Bama law. Called them up, asked if they had any distant cousins attending their institution based on family name/ Ancestry.con DNA. They did not. I replied I was regrettably no longer interested in their institution.
Are you sure you ever did
OlDirtyBtard
20:36
all i'm saying is, i would debase myself to dean cooper for a cornell A
11ama
20:37
@OlDirtyBtard: Being an asshole is not sufficient for being funny, Unc.
11ama
20:37
Trust me, I tried it many a times b4/
20:39
I wonder if schools are punishing R&R's with no increases to GPA or LSAT.
20:40
Or no new work experience.
20:40
Last cycle people who are too burnt to go get something impressive to add to their resume and application.
11ama
21:00
@JuicyApple: Oh no doubt. Wouldn't you be perturbed if you rejected someone and they came back next year with a 'hey boo, its me again' ?
fedclerkhopeful
21:02
Yeah that’s def a real fear. I think too it puts people who have high stats but are going to reapply in a weird place because you can’t even improve the most important parts of your app
11ama
21:03
I'm sure it falls in the same category as retaking the LSAT: one more thing to be held against you.
21:05
Alrighty then. Sounds bad.
OlDirtyBtard
21:06
nah tbh just reapp to make them say no
OlDirtyBtard
21:06
advance out of spite alone
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.